Message from @VukHR
Discord ID: 634714587043725325
There might be an equal distribution of brown and blonde
there is little point in subcategorizing too much
because it's too messy
Yeah, that's why I'm only doing genetics and language family
As to avoid legitimizing phony identities
well genes dont lies yes
ok
but all groups are not equal
some groups are more similar
some are much less
in the same space
Yes
Anglos literally have more Germanic blood on average than the Austrians do
this is wrong again
it' snot wrong that it's true
but haplogroups don't work like this
Yes they do
no they dont
thats just the Y part
I think we all have blonde genes.
it might be true, but that map doesn't prove it
Markoman BTFO
chat shut down
Haplogroups indicate shared ancestry along the maternal and paternal lines lol
yes
but they don't mean much
That makes no sense
it depends on how the haplogroup got where it got
I think people probably invest too much into maps like this but nonetheless
it's because half is lost
every time
if it was just a few men dominating the whole population in the new place, you might not get that much autosomal dna
Whichever two are most common in a population can best distinguish them from others, although you still need to account for admixture along both lines
You can also infer a lot from language variation
I1 in norway
but if it was a large migration, or a long period of migration, you would
is not the same as I1 in another place
it's not even the same in terms of that
Yes that's what subclades are for
i'm telling you right now