Whichever two are most common in a population can best distinguish them from others, although you still need to account for admixture along both lines

You can also infer a lot from language variation

I1 in norway

but if it was a large migration, or a long period of migration, you would

is not the same as I1 in another place

it's not even the same in terms of that

Yes that's what subclades are for

i'm telling you right now

R1b is most common in all of Europe but clearly there are distinctions

Anyway, Anglos took over the world by being chads

you need to throw haplogroups out of the window

it's good for 1 thing only

And your europoor copes are annoying

and that's to show that it's a line of descent

as in

Yes, subclades can distinguish population groups

replacement and movement

Or Norwegian I1 from 'other' I1

Yes

it still doens't work

it's still mostly useless

They don't think it work like it do, but it do

on anglo hair colour: it's not as simple as 'blond or brown'

Anglos tend to have hair which sits between the two colours

Anglos also have nifty red

i find that islanders hair color is more red

Very diverse

it's more reddish in color

the blonde, the brown

Also here's the map for the genes of another germanic archaic group

Anglos = both Germanic and also the best people to ever exist

in short, haplogroups do not tell you genetic similarity, it tells you descent

Thank you for coming to my ted talk

Descent is indicative of genetic similarity lol

Anglos are the true Germans.

I understand it doesn't illustrate the full picture but it's still true

Also the highest proportions on that map are 10% lol

Does it mean 10% of the average person's DNA or 10% of the population or....

Like I said that was a secondary Germanic haplogroup not the main one

it's like you write it once

i mean