Message from @Banjod

Discord ID: 638988442813857812


2019-10-30 06:30:25 UTC  

The overarching point is that there are variances and I don't give a fuck exactly how they exist 😆

2019-10-30 06:30:29 UTC  

Sociology TM

2019-10-30 06:30:37 UTC  

well, its consistent across all measures and studies

2019-10-30 06:30:38 UTC  

Look up the twin niching effect, @Nerthulas

2019-10-30 06:30:51 UTC  

but its consistent across ***all*** twin studies

2019-10-30 06:30:52 UTC  

Sexual reproduction causes the shuffling around (recombination) which breaks the epistasis so it actually isn't the death toll for heritability estimates or quantitative genetics

2019-10-30 06:30:54 UTC  

Maybe there's a consistent sociological effect, @Nerthulas?

2019-10-30 06:30:58 UTC  

if they didn't treat them the same, wouldn't that make them score differently?

2019-10-30 06:31:05 UTC  

A confounding sociological variable.

2019-10-30 06:31:05 UTC  

that's the opposit eof the claim

2019-10-30 06:31:12 UTC  

but its different from the other siblings @BabygottBach

2019-10-30 06:31:16 UTC  

"Parent may treat their twins differently by 1/10,000th of a degree, therefore ambiguity on heritability

2019-10-30 06:31:18 UTC  

lmao

2019-10-30 06:31:26 UTC  

so they are more alike to each other than to people they share environment with

2019-10-30 06:31:27 UTC  

omg you guys are still at it

2019-10-30 06:31:29 UTC  

can you explain this?

2019-10-30 06:31:36 UTC  

@TheUserNameofPeace, where's the evidence for how close the parents treat their twins?

2019-10-30 06:31:42 UTC  

It's pretty obvious actually considering we have been breeding animals and plants (and prob humans too) for over ten thousand years with great success

2019-10-30 06:31:46 UTC  

twin adoption studies

2019-10-30 06:31:47 UTC  
2019-10-30 06:31:56 UTC  

still score the same..

2019-10-30 06:32:05 UTC  

sociological effects

2019-10-30 06:32:08 UTC  

@BabygottBach but can you explain why the twins are always more alike in intelligence than their non-related siblings

2019-10-30 06:32:09 UTC  

kraut already explained twin studies are useless unless you precisely understand the genetic mechanisms

2019-10-30 06:32:19 UTC  

Separated twins perform similiarly

2019-10-30 06:32:23 UTC  

Raised separated

2019-10-30 06:32:28 UTC  

sociological effects are the answer @TheUserNameofPeace ?

2019-10-30 06:32:35 UTC  

Sociological effects

2019-10-30 06:32:37 UTC  

yep

2019-10-30 06:32:43 UTC  

How do you know

2019-10-30 06:32:46 UTC  

no

2019-10-30 06:32:49 UTC  

what sociological effect causes twins to be 80% alike in intelligence? @BabygottBach

2019-10-30 06:32:51 UTC  

can you tell me?

2019-10-30 06:32:52 UTC  

until you debunk the sociological effect hypothesis, you're just arguing god of the gaps

2019-10-30 06:33:06 UTC  

thats liyerally your argument

2019-10-30 06:33:13 UTC  

It's fascinating how mirrored the two positions are.

2019-10-30 06:33:37 UTC  

Jesus this guy is such a sophist

2019-10-30 06:33:39 UTC  

I ask for the genetic molecular mechanisms, I get accused of god of the gaps

2019-10-30 06:33:40 UTC  

I just want you to explain why the twins perform so similarly @BabygottBach

2019-10-30 06:33:44 UTC  

it seems like you're squirming