you are a crazy person

Lets do a classic biology taxonomy as most animals got their distinctions:
Oh look these two birds look the same but their noses! Different subspecies

Oh look these two walking hairless apes look different by skin, blood, attitude, intelligence, noses, skull shape and more! Different fucking subspecies

<:smug:639989438285611010>

Or races

Or whatever u want to call it

you and the majority are ignoring human biodiversity and are actively on a campaign to destroy it, how is this moral

cause you justify it with science?

@Deleted User this, fuck

the anti-christs I tell you

@glamp Dude just so you know its a really bad arguement to say those traits means race is justified. Also, just because race is intuitive to you doesnt mean science is.

Define race taxonomically

Lets walk u by the hand

What is race but a categorization by biological traits? Or do you have a specific definition other than that, @Yek

intuitive black now

@Yek So are you campaigning to end the distinctions amongst wolves?

Tigers?

<:kraut:389881471881576448>

Jays

Corvids

You guys aren't being fair. Yek has a very consistent position.

?

Magic brains

secular creationist

the brain is pretty magic tbh

<:tucker:587843675413807106>

@Yek of course its justified, we categorize things based on much lesser differences. there are recognized subspecies of elk that you'd need a trained zoologist to discern between because the differences are so subtle. if you think the differences between chinese and europeans, or europeans and africans, or native americans and abos, arent enough to warrant race you have some sort of brain problem

im sorry, but this seriously is like looking up at the sky and saying its not blue

you sound insane

@blanc Its an informal biological category. There are lower taxonomical frequencies such as sub species, however even that isnt universally accepted in mdoern taxonomy.

@glamp Again, science isnt intuitive.

@Yek
>informal
Great then we can assign traits and categorize races informally!

i wish the asian skull was the one that was yellow

Oh wow

So in order to bring about the global mulatto, Yek's willing to toss out all sub-speciation

That's expectable move for the globo-homos in fact

What do you call human varieties friend

@Yek you have no science. i already explained why more variation within than between is a weak argument. this holds true for humans and a subspecies of chimp. do you think the human chimp distinction is meaningless?

and we are the evil "Nazi's" lol

@blanc human variation?

"Universally accepted in modern taxonomy" so we must go by what the consensus of academia alone says?