Message from @Hector
Discord ID: 642611465035186187
Yeah but why? why is it like that?
>sometimes it do be like that
if i know someone is there to manipulate the cards, sure thats valid
see quantum suicide thought experiment
just an indication, not proof or disproof..
what you've said is actually possible
So I recognize you can that you can draw Ace Ace Ace and Ace but more likely you cheated.
The quantum suicide thought experiment involves the same apparatus as Schrödinger's cat – a box which kills the occupant in a given time frame with probability one half due to quantum uncertainty. The only difference is to have the experimenter recording observations be the one inside the box. The significance of this is that someone whose life or death depends on a qubit can distinguish between interpretations of quantum mechanics. By definition, fixed observers cannot.
But that would assume that God is possible which I can not prove as of now.
Do you have an good books on quantum mechanics. I am a librarian on a library server. I want to expand some of the fields.
At the start of the first iteration, under both interpretations, the probability of surviving the experiment is 50%, as given by the squared norm of the wave function. At the start of the second iteration, assuming the Copenhagen interpretation is true, the wave function has already collapsed; thus, if the experimenter is already dead, there is a 0% chance of survival for any further iterations. However, if the many-worlds interpretation is true, a superposition of the live experimenter necessarily exists (as also does the one who dies). After every iteration only one of the two experimenter superpositions – the live one – is capable of having any sort of conscious experience. Putting aside the philosophical problems associated with individual identity and its persistence, we may assert that, under the many-worlds interpretation, the experimenter, or at least a version of them, continues to exist through all of their superpositions where the outcome of the experiment is that they live. In other words, we may say that a version of the experimenter survives all iterations of the experiment, whichever its number. Since the superpositions where a version of the experimenter lives occur by quantum necessity (again, under the many-worlds interpretation), it follows that their survival, after any realizable number of iterations, is physically necessary; hence, the notion of quantum immortality.
why?
Why what, Panik?
This is level 3 of the multiverse
Oh, I heard of this and had it explained once but forgot.
>why am I here
to shut the heel ap
we didnt evolve brains to understand tthe scale of the universe so we invent god to justify our existence
but its not necessary
there's a good recent qm book good for beginners
eh, not to be rude, but I think I know this a little bit better than you

its not a controversial claim.... we have experiments showing quantum inteference effects, particles interacting with multiverse superpositions of themselves
similarly all the best models of the big bang require inflation
so the inflationary multiverse is actually the most likely scenario
based on observable evidence
ahh it starts with good ol stern-gerlach
that never gets old
I think this is enough for now. Before, I used to shit on the Telelogical Argument. I am reconsidering it now. Bye, Banjod, Fuguer, glamp, panik, and others. This was fun.
it's a nice book, it's got a bunch of interactive html files
The detailed particle physics mechanism responsible for inflation is unknown. The **basic inflationary paradigm is accepted by most physicists**, as **a number of inflation model predictions have been confirmed by observation**; however, a substantial minority of scientists dissent from this position.The hypothetical field thought to be responsible for inflation is called the inflaton.
If god help you stay sane enjoy
shes ok
I do not think God helps me stay sane. If anything, my recent conversion has been stressful.
if you want good proofs for gods existence that cant be invalidated with physics, read ed feser's book "five proofs of the existence of god"
