Message from @Hector

Discord ID: 642611465035186187


2019-11-09 06:25:30 UTC  

Yeah but why? why is it like that?

2019-11-09 06:25:38 UTC  

>sometimes it do be like that

2019-11-09 06:25:39 UTC  

if i know someone is there to manipulate the cards, sure thats valid

2019-11-09 06:25:59 UTC  

see quantum suicide thought experiment

2019-11-09 06:26:04 UTC  

just an indication, not proof or disproof..

2019-11-09 06:26:05 UTC  

what you've said is actually possible

2019-11-09 06:26:10 UTC  

So I recognize you can that you can draw Ace Ace Ace and Ace but more likely you cheated.

2019-11-09 06:26:32 UTC  

The quantum suicide thought experiment involves the same apparatus as Schrödinger's cat – a box which kills the occupant in a given time frame with probability one half due to quantum uncertainty. The only difference is to have the experimenter recording observations be the one inside the box. The significance of this is that someone whose life or death depends on a qubit can distinguish between interpretations of quantum mechanics. By definition, fixed observers cannot.

2019-11-09 06:26:35 UTC  

But that would assume that God is possible which I can not prove as of now.

2019-11-09 06:27:09 UTC  

Do you have an good books on quantum mechanics. I am a librarian on a library server. I want to expand some of the fields.

2019-11-09 06:27:15 UTC  

At the start of the first iteration, under both interpretations, the probability of surviving the experiment is 50%, as given by the squared norm of the wave function. At the start of the second iteration, assuming the Copenhagen interpretation is true, the wave function has already collapsed; thus, if the experimenter is already dead, there is a 0% chance of survival for any further iterations. However, if the many-worlds interpretation is true, a superposition of the live experimenter necessarily exists (as also does the one who dies). After every iteration only one of the two experimenter superpositions – the live one – is capable of having any sort of conscious experience. Putting aside the philosophical problems associated with individual identity and its persistence, we may assert that, under the many-worlds interpretation, the experimenter, or at least a version of them, continues to exist through all of their superpositions where the outcome of the experiment is that they live. In other words, we may say that a version of the experimenter survives all iterations of the experiment, whichever its number. Since the superpositions where a version of the experimenter lives occur by quantum necessity (again, under the many-worlds interpretation), it follows that their survival, after any realizable number of iterations, is physically necessary; hence, the notion of quantum immortality.

2019-11-09 06:27:15 UTC  

why?

2019-11-09 06:27:27 UTC  

Why what, Panik?

2019-11-09 06:27:44 UTC  

This is level 3 of the multiverse

2019-11-09 06:27:46 UTC  

Oh, I heard of this and had it explained once but forgot.

2019-11-09 06:27:47 UTC  

>why am I here
to shut the heel ap

2019-11-09 06:28:18 UTC  

we didnt evolve brains to understand tthe scale of the universe so we invent god to justify our existence

2019-11-09 06:28:22 UTC  

but its not necessary

2019-11-09 06:28:28 UTC  

there's a good recent qm book good for beginners

2019-11-09 06:28:32 UTC  

Well, that is a huge claim.

2019-11-09 06:28:44 UTC  

@glamp do tell.

2019-11-09 06:29:07 UTC  

eh, not to be rude, but I think I know this a little bit better than you

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/642611612791996426/unknown.png

2019-11-09 06:29:10 UTC  

its not a controversial claim.... we have experiments showing quantum inteference effects, particles interacting with multiverse superpositions of themselves

2019-11-09 06:29:42 UTC  

@glamp just tell me the title.

2019-11-09 06:29:55 UTC  

similarly all the best models of the big bang require inflation

2019-11-09 06:30:05 UTC  

so the inflationary multiverse is actually the most likely scenario

2019-11-09 06:30:15 UTC  

based on observable evidence

2019-11-09 06:30:45 UTC  

ahh it starts with good ol stern-gerlach

2019-11-09 06:30:48 UTC  

that never gets old

2019-11-09 06:31:17 UTC  

I think this is enough for now. Before, I used to shit on the Telelogical Argument. I am reconsidering it now. Bye, Banjod, Fuguer, glamp, panik, and others. This was fun.

2019-11-09 06:31:46 UTC  

it's a nice book, it's got a bunch of interactive html files

2019-11-09 06:32:00 UTC  

The detailed particle physics mechanism responsible for inflation is unknown. The **basic inflationary paradigm is accepted by most physicists**, as **a number of inflation model predictions have been confirmed by observation**; however, a substantial minority of scientists dissent from this position.The hypothetical field thought to be responsible for inflation is called the inflaton.

2019-11-09 06:32:34 UTC  

@glamp found a copy, thanks

2019-11-09 06:32:59 UTC  

If god help you stay sane enjoy

2019-11-09 06:32:59 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/642612584331214848/1573231344756.png

2019-11-09 06:33:37 UTC  

shes ok

2019-11-09 06:33:41 UTC  

I do not think God helps me stay sane. If anything, my recent conversion has been stressful.

2019-11-09 06:33:46 UTC  

if you want good proofs for gods existence that cant be invalidated with physics, read ed feser's book "five proofs of the existence of god"