Message from @Hector
Discord ID: 642610870471360533
we already showed, the higgs had the chance to break the electroweak symmetry in NUMEROUS ways... each different way would result in different fundamental particles and laws
and we got this one
which is unlikely..
I'm not saying it's proof
i'm just saying it's an indication
that diagonal line is electric charge which emerged as a conserved symmetry as a result of the higgs
and we get stable chemistry
the point is that just like there are many planets in the universe, there are many universes in the multiverse
it could have landed anywhere
it's just fancy science talk to me, it's not important that it can happen
theres lots of planets, lots of multiverses with different physical constants
just that it did
So, an example is imagine we are playing a card game. You draw 200 hands in a row Ace Ace Ace Ace, winning each time. I and another player go to shoot you. But you say that you are just in the universe where you drew 200 Ace, Ace, Ace, and Ace hands. which is more likely, you drew Ace,Ace,Ace, and Ace or that you manipulated the cards?
Yeah but why? why is it like that?
>sometimes it do be like that
if i know someone is there to manipulate the cards, sure thats valid
see quantum suicide thought experiment
just an indication, not proof or disproof..
what you've said is actually possible
The quantum suicide thought experiment involves the same apparatus as Schrödinger's cat – a box which kills the occupant in a given time frame with probability one half due to quantum uncertainty. The only difference is to have the experimenter recording observations be the one inside the box. The significance of this is that someone whose life or death depends on a qubit can distinguish between interpretations of quantum mechanics. By definition, fixed observers cannot.
But that would assume that God is possible which I can not prove as of now.
Do you have an good books on quantum mechanics. I am a librarian on a library server. I want to expand some of the fields.
At the start of the first iteration, under both interpretations, the probability of surviving the experiment is 50%, as given by the squared norm of the wave function. At the start of the second iteration, assuming the Copenhagen interpretation is true, the wave function has already collapsed; thus, if the experimenter is already dead, there is a 0% chance of survival for any further iterations. However, if the many-worlds interpretation is true, a superposition of the live experimenter necessarily exists (as also does the one who dies). After every iteration only one of the two experimenter superpositions – the live one – is capable of having any sort of conscious experience. Putting aside the philosophical problems associated with individual identity and its persistence, we may assert that, under the many-worlds interpretation, the experimenter, or at least a version of them, continues to exist through all of their superpositions where the outcome of the experiment is that they live. In other words, we may say that a version of the experimenter survives all iterations of the experiment, whichever its number. Since the superpositions where a version of the experimenter lives occur by quantum necessity (again, under the many-worlds interpretation), it follows that their survival, after any realizable number of iterations, is physically necessary; hence, the notion of quantum immortality.
why?
Why what, Panik?
This is level 3 of the multiverse
Oh, I heard of this and had it explained once but forgot.
>why am I here
to shut the heel ap
we didnt evolve brains to understand tthe scale of the universe so we invent god to justify our existence
but its not necessary
there's a good recent qm book good for beginners
Well, that is a huge claim.
eh, not to be rude, but I think I know this a little bit better than you

its not a controversial claim.... we have experiments showing quantum inteference effects, particles interacting with multiverse superpositions of themselves
similarly all the best models of the big bang require inflation
