Message from @fuguer

Discord ID: 642612034340651009


2019-11-09 06:27:09 UTC  

Do you have an good books on quantum mechanics. I am a librarian on a library server. I want to expand some of the fields.

2019-11-09 06:27:15 UTC  

At the start of the first iteration, under both interpretations, the probability of surviving the experiment is 50%, as given by the squared norm of the wave function. At the start of the second iteration, assuming the Copenhagen interpretation is true, the wave function has already collapsed; thus, if the experimenter is already dead, there is a 0% chance of survival for any further iterations. However, if the many-worlds interpretation is true, a superposition of the live experimenter necessarily exists (as also does the one who dies). After every iteration only one of the two experimenter superpositions – the live one – is capable of having any sort of conscious experience. Putting aside the philosophical problems associated with individual identity and its persistence, we may assert that, under the many-worlds interpretation, the experimenter, or at least a version of them, continues to exist through all of their superpositions where the outcome of the experiment is that they live. In other words, we may say that a version of the experimenter survives all iterations of the experiment, whichever its number. Since the superpositions where a version of the experimenter lives occur by quantum necessity (again, under the many-worlds interpretation), it follows that their survival, after any realizable number of iterations, is physically necessary; hence, the notion of quantum immortality.

2019-11-09 06:27:15 UTC  

why?

2019-11-09 06:27:27 UTC  

Why what, Panik?

2019-11-09 06:27:44 UTC  

This is level 3 of the multiverse

2019-11-09 06:27:46 UTC  

Oh, I heard of this and had it explained once but forgot.

2019-11-09 06:27:47 UTC  

>why am I here
to shut the heel ap

2019-11-09 06:28:18 UTC  

we didnt evolve brains to understand tthe scale of the universe so we invent god to justify our existence

2019-11-09 06:28:22 UTC  

but its not necessary

2019-11-09 06:28:28 UTC  

there's a good recent qm book good for beginners

2019-11-09 06:28:32 UTC  

Well, that is a huge claim.

2019-11-09 06:28:44 UTC  

@glamp do tell.

2019-11-09 06:29:07 UTC  

eh, not to be rude, but I think I know this a little bit better than you

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/642611612791996426/unknown.png

2019-11-09 06:29:10 UTC  

its not a controversial claim.... we have experiments showing quantum inteference effects, particles interacting with multiverse superpositions of themselves

2019-11-09 06:29:42 UTC  

@glamp just tell me the title.

2019-11-09 06:29:55 UTC  

similarly all the best models of the big bang require inflation

2019-11-09 06:30:05 UTC  

so the inflationary multiverse is actually the most likely scenario

2019-11-09 06:30:15 UTC  

based on observable evidence

2019-11-09 06:30:45 UTC  

ahh it starts with good ol stern-gerlach

2019-11-09 06:30:48 UTC  

that never gets old

2019-11-09 06:31:17 UTC  

I think this is enough for now. Before, I used to shit on the Telelogical Argument. I am reconsidering it now. Bye, Banjod, Fuguer, glamp, panik, and others. This was fun.

2019-11-09 06:31:46 UTC  

it's a nice book, it's got a bunch of interactive html files

2019-11-09 06:32:00 UTC  

The detailed particle physics mechanism responsible for inflation is unknown. The **basic inflationary paradigm is accepted by most physicists**, as **a number of inflation model predictions have been confirmed by observation**; however, a substantial minority of scientists dissent from this position.The hypothetical field thought to be responsible for inflation is called the inflaton.

2019-11-09 06:32:34 UTC  

@glamp found a copy, thanks

2019-11-09 06:32:59 UTC  

If god help you stay sane enjoy

2019-11-09 06:32:59 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/642612584331214848/1573231344756.png

2019-11-09 06:33:37 UTC  

shes ok

2019-11-09 06:33:41 UTC  

I do not think God helps me stay sane. If anything, my recent conversion has been stressful.

2019-11-09 06:33:46 UTC  

if you want good proofs for gods existence that cant be invalidated with physics, read ed feser's book "five proofs of the existence of god"

2019-11-09 06:33:58 UTC  

it's written for laymen

2019-11-09 06:34:06 UTC  

bye, guys. Need to finish this book so I can read that book on Nietzsche.

2019-11-09 06:34:16 UTC  

glamp say it aint so

2019-11-09 06:34:23 UTC  

you're not god cucking are you

2019-11-09 06:34:31 UTC  

@Billy Ray gym e-thot being put in check

2019-11-09 06:34:35 UTC  

@glamp I do not like most of the arguments. Though, 1. is entertaining.

2019-11-09 06:34:50 UTC  

sorry duck but physics has to bend the knee to metaphysics

2019-11-09 06:34:56 UTC  

the five arguments feel like they were written by a bright kindergartener

2019-11-09 06:34:57 UTC  

science doesn't disprove god though

2019-11-09 06:35:02 UTC  

theyre not very compelling