Message from @fuguer

Discord ID: 642616557859635210


2019-11-09 06:43:36 UTC  

anyone got an image of black on white vs white on black crime statistics

2019-11-09 06:43:37 UTC  

(string theory assumes the small rolled up dimensions form loops curving in on themselves), and strings can wind around these dimensions

2019-11-09 06:43:50 UTC  

so clearly macroscopic dimensions would have the same basic structure and be cyclic as well

2019-11-09 06:44:20 UTC  

2. time and space are similar, so we could expect time to have a cyclic loop structure as well

2019-11-09 06:44:32 UTC  

3. particles can self interact creating immense complexity

2019-11-09 06:45:04 UTC  

picture the universe wrapping itself in knots interacting with itself across time and space recursively

2019-11-09 06:45:39 UTC  

Wheeler proposed something similar with the one electron universe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe

2019-11-09 06:46:03 UTC  

GIVE ME THE 5 PROOFS OF GOD <:REEEE:640033860067000350>

2019-11-09 06:46:35 UTC  

you gotta read

2019-11-09 06:47:10 UTC  

Why does god need five proofs

2019-11-09 06:47:16 UTC  

shouldnt one be enough

2019-11-09 06:47:24 UTC  

obviously if there's five, they're weak and full of holes

2019-11-09 06:47:44 UTC  

"ohh ok you only disproved 4 of the proofs"

2019-11-09 06:48:02 UTC  

theyve all stood unchallenged for 800 years

2019-11-09 06:48:17 UTC  

i challenge them

2019-11-09 06:48:19 UTC  

well except for the argument from motion, that ones stood for 2300 years

2019-11-09 06:48:21 UTC  

1. White People
2. Hitler
3. You can't prove God doesn't exist.
4. Ropes.
5. My mom told me so.

2019-11-09 06:48:22 UTC  

since aristotle

2019-11-09 06:48:32 UTC  

ropes is the most convincing

2019-11-09 06:48:41 UTC  

the argument from motion is literally brainlet though

2019-11-09 06:48:46 UTC  

they make zero sense

2019-11-09 06:49:10 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/642616657495195693/philosophy-of-realism-in-education-11-638.jpg

2019-11-09 06:49:21 UTC  

inertia isnt a valid counter argument

2019-11-09 06:49:49 UTC  

4 is the worst type of cope

2019-11-09 06:50:00 UTC  

"there needs to be a most perfect being"

2019-11-09 06:50:04 UTC  

"that being is god"

2019-11-09 06:50:44 UTC  

you're doing what young earth christian fundies do with evolution. "oh if evolution is true, why are there still monkeys"

2019-11-09 06:50:47 UTC  

to that i would say, you dont have an objective definition of perfection

2019-11-09 06:51:10 UTC  

and nothing says a maximally perfect being is god... it could be some massive unvierse spanning AI network, it still wouldnt be god

2019-11-09 06:51:16 UTC  

the arguments are way more sophisticated then these caricature internet summaries present them as

2019-11-09 06:51:23 UTC  

hahaha science faggots hahahahahaha

2019-11-09 06:51:26 UTC  

*guffaw*

2019-11-09 06:51:30 UTC  

thats reasonable glamp

2019-11-09 06:51:42 UTC  

you can present them someday

2019-11-09 06:51:51 UTC  

why does one not make sense though? It's basically saying whatever force that caused the big bang, was god

2019-11-09 06:52:04 UTC  

no

2019-11-09 06:52:05 UTC  

implying the big bang exists

2019-11-09 06:52:10 UTC  

it literally doesnt not say that

2019-11-09 06:52:12 UTC  

what caused god then?

2019-11-09 06:52:16 UTC  

thats the caricature

2019-11-09 06:52:17 UTC  

implying we could ever know the truth of the creation of the universe