Rather those views of the Universe as eternal and cyclical are earlier found in the Vedas

when aquinas says motion he's talking about change in general

we know that a single electron can interact with itself

not only things changing position

Correct

That's exactly what the Vedas say, Fug

@Hector sure

i suspect even the smallest kernel of the universe can create something infinitely vast through self interaction

@Deleted User watch all his videos. He is the guy that got me to convert.

Good stuff

leonard susskind talks about this as well, the expansion of complexity growing inside black holes

its inevitable and tied to entropy

MMW maybe the vedas had some good ideas

I think you are only thinking of God in the Abrahamic sense

1. we strongly suspect spatial dimensions are curved

Ttyl later for sure this time

it was fun

anyone got an image of black on white vs white on black crime statistics

(string theory assumes the small rolled up dimensions form loops curving in on themselves), and strings can wind around these dimensions

so clearly macroscopic dimensions would have the same basic structure and be cyclic as well

2. time and space are similar, so we could expect time to have a cyclic loop structure as well

3. particles can self interact creating immense complexity

picture the universe wrapping itself in knots interacting with itself across time and space recursively

Wheeler proposed something similar with the one electron universe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe

GIVE ME THE 5 PROOFS OF GOD <:REEEE:640033860067000350>

you gotta read

Why does god need five proofs

shouldnt one be enough

obviously if there's five, they're weak and full of holes

"ohh ok you only disproved 4 of the proofs"

theyve all stood unchallenged for 800 years

i challenge them

well except for the argument from motion, that ones stood for 2300 years

1. White People
2. Hitler
3. You can't prove God doesn't exist.
4. Ropes.
5. My mom told me so.

since aristotle

ropes is the most convincing

the argument from motion is literally brainlet though

they make zero sense

inertia isnt a valid counter argument

4 is the worst type of cope