@MatthewHeimbach question: if Ukraine is not a legitimate nation because they have historically been Russian, doesn't that invalidate American futurism?

we killed the indians, so

fuck em

Might makes right

this, but us
It says “Anaïs, 26 years old. fights to protect our identity”

well, those of us who are comfortable with it at least

“This is Matt. He fights to protect your identity.”

Hey comrades. I am in Hermiston, OR and I'm moving out here at the end of the month. Anyone in the area I can collaborate with?

hey niggers

the heimbach memes gave me a good laugh today on break

when i was on break

West Virginia here.

this may be the boomerpost of the year boys

get ready

That cant be real

idk man.

its funny as fuck either way

Real and gay

Lol

Merica

@MatthewHeimbach anthropologically speaking, the most powerful factor for ethno-genesis is oppression. The post-revolutionary American culture, good or bad, was born out of the conflict. Maybe there wasn't a Ukrainian culture historically that was unique from Russia, but wouldn't calling Ukraine a sham be denying both that new cultures can form and that the Ukrainian culture might have been created due to their oppression in the Holodomor?

What I'm trying to ask is, if Azov's war against Russia is illegitimate, what would be legitimate? It's a precedent that, as far as I can see, also makes the whisky rebellion, the war of northern aggression, the battle of Blair mountain, and ourselves illegitimate

And sorry if I misrepresented your position at all, we didn't really discuss your reasoning in depth besides the point I mentioned. I just feel that the issue is worth discussing because if we're just anti-azov by virtue of being pro-russia, that seems to be cutting off our nose to spite our face

Heil Hitler!

Azov can get bent because they're aligning with the globalists to achieve their nationalist imperative.

Same for Barcelona.

That is a good point

Those pursuing their nationalist ambitions can and should be left to fend for themselves unless they align with the worldwide nationalist movement. It's simple game theory.

So if they had gone about it a different way, would we support them over Russia?

Russia's hands are far from clean, but Ukraine--and Azov--aren't my business unless they make it my business by aligning firmly against the globalists.

I can't speak for everyone. But, yeah. Absolutely.

Fair enough. We're against the tactics, not the struggle itself

It's kind of like the AltRighters who try to do that clever thing where they support Zionism to be logically consistent and achieve zingers.

Ideological cuckoldry.

I support driving every last Israeli into the sea and replacing it with a Persian puppet state.

They are kinda like the Serbs AFTER losing to the Turks. Then they became their mercenaries. Azov is by doing this effectively being JWO zog mercenaries

Obviously, the Ukrainians aren't Jews or anything like that.

Slowly and steadily, an AltRight is emerging which will follow a similar template. Jews aren't categorically opposed to White Nationalism. They'll just oppose it until it's big and useful. Then they'll promote an Azov-style faction within it.

That being said irrespective of which side of the conflict individuals support i think people need to stop drinking the Putin koolaid