Message from @ScaredForLife

Discord ID: 644696888641191987


2019-11-15 00:33:39 UTC  

and JF operates in a different area

2019-11-15 00:33:39 UTC  

that's all people who split hairs are just retarded

2019-11-15 00:33:43 UTC  

We should all practice basic optics I.e. don't wave the Swastika around

2019-11-15 00:33:49 UTC  

i agree best is probably someting like formulating what u belive in in a strgith forward way with as good optics as posible without saying things u dont acctualy think

2019-11-15 00:33:56 UTC  

everyone cannot be a political activist, a reporter or an ideologue

2019-11-15 00:33:59 UTC  

problem is, nick is disingeneous and hypocritical about optics

2019-11-15 00:34:19 UTC  

hanging with milo, jacob wohl, baked alaska = not good optics

2019-11-15 00:34:28 UTC  

calling people "faggots" on your show = not good optics

2019-11-15 00:34:32 UTC  

everyone plays their role to the best of their capacity in the end they all agree that the current state of US society is sinking down

2019-11-15 00:34:44 UTC  

I think optics can be important, however, your optics should be based upon the goals for what you want to achieve

2019-11-15 00:34:44 UTC  

his optics concern are born out of personal taste and snobbery

2019-11-15 00:34:47 UTC  

and that's it

2019-11-15 00:34:48 UTC  

ofcs slurs for no reason is genraly not good

2019-11-15 00:34:49 UTC  

lol

2019-11-15 00:34:50 UTC  

@Str3tch I think Fuentes is bold and young

2019-11-15 00:34:51 UTC  

In terms of optics, there is being stupid and looking crazy but then there is also becoming paranoid about it being optical, which can soften your own arguments.

2019-11-15 00:34:54 UTC  

Nick calls everyone who isn't a tradcath a "gay wignat"

2019-11-15 00:35:01 UTC  

he's not bold

2019-11-15 00:35:04 UTC  

he's a normie

2019-11-15 00:35:08 UTC  

a red-pilled normie

2019-11-15 00:35:16 UTC  

Not appearing crazy should be common sense not optics

2019-11-15 00:35:32 UTC  

he's bold in the sense that he took risk people of his age would have never took @Str3tch

2019-11-15 00:35:44 UTC  

for instance, spencers pan europeanism (whether you agree with it or not) would barr him for any political office currently, however, he's not trying for that, he's more of the kind of guy who a politician would read about, or listen to.

2019-11-15 00:35:44 UTC  

ahh yeah

2019-11-15 00:35:44 UTC  

he could be a shapiro 2.0 and work at foxnews

2019-11-15 00:35:45 UTC  

for sure

2019-11-15 00:35:50 UTC  

considering nick is where he is cus he was basicly fuck shapiro he will prob come closer to our side with time

2019-11-15 00:36:02 UTC  

I respect Fuentes for putting himself out there though, I could never do it.

2019-11-15 00:36:06 UTC  

blazing your own trail is certainly bold, you're correct

2019-11-15 00:36:17 UTC  

Nick could've been token GOP Hispanic commentator

2019-11-15 00:36:20 UTC  

Nick is just doing the sane dumb crap that made GLR create the Nazi party in the US. Infiltrating doesn't work

2019-11-15 00:36:23 UTC  

yup that takes some balls

2019-11-15 00:36:29 UTC  

He needs direction

2019-11-15 00:36:29 UTC  

advices

2019-11-15 00:36:29 UTC  

and experience

2019-11-15 00:36:34 UTC  

fuentes is making a few thousand dollars per day right now. he is doing better than a lot of fox talent, with less viewership

2019-11-15 00:36:51 UTC  

yes, but for how long?

2019-11-15 00:36:51 UTC  

based

2019-11-15 00:37:11 UTC  

he better invest in chainlink

2019-11-15 00:37:21 UTC  

calling ur movment ''nazi'' is fucking awfull optics dont be idiots

2019-11-15 00:37:24 UTC  

Start the Nickers Institute for Geopolitical Strategy and Analysis