I like to go to leftist places and just politely explain my position, but they always ban me for it even if I don't come remotely close to violating any of their rules.
Most leftists in my opinion are more feels and virtue signal based than rational. So I try to use language they are comfortable with to explain right wing positions. For example, describing income tax as labor value expropriation (theft)
the whole point of milo is to make the center seem edgy to faggots. as soon as someone pops up making the center seem like fags, milo is back to remind you how bad it is to stray from conservative inc.
milo makes normies think conservative inc is cool and edgy. nick puts the lie to bed. so milo reminds people challenging conservative inc that everything you've said near a mic is on tape in databases
the main problem with the alt-right is that its a money loser. if you stop immigration / deport illegals you kill the housing market, for starters. you have to find a way out that doesn't cost money, i think. how can a movement that proposes reducing net worths by trillions actually get anywhere?
virtually every single election result can be flipped by a 100 people responsible for voting tallies in precincts in swing states. thats asymmetric warfare for non-retards
guys, we have this belief system that a supermajority of people profess that is super useful at fighting cancer but .... it's too old. lets do something else! ..... how pozzed can you get?
banning usury is your most plausible policy platform to get passed, and also maximum kvetching inducing. thats thanks to religion. its your friend, and anyone saying otherwise is clueless
thats wrong. jesus said it would be better to tie a stone around the abusers of little ones and toss them into the sea, than to permit further harm to the children. its a very warlike religion
i guarantee you no one with any power is worried what some loser in a trailer park thinks, no matter how white he is. there is just a subset of whites that bothers them, the ones with community and values (christianity) and the belief in fighting for them
the bottom line is that 95% of people are retarded. if you dont push a religion on them that points in the right direction they are going to be good goy materialist puppets. so either support religion and push them in a productive direction or accept defeat
there are about 80 million illiterates in the USA, and the winner of presidential elections gets around 60 million votes lately. there is no limit to how "ridiculous" seeming thinsg can get and still be perfectly useful
theres two groups of whites with above replacement fertility, mormnos, evangelicals, catholics. wmeanwhile atheists and agnostics way below. you're either pushing mormon, catholoc, evangelical or you're anti-white. thats the bottom line
at the end of the day the only thing that matters is the birth rates. if you're pushing low birth rate shit instead of high birth rate shit you're a LARPer
i have no problem with successful memetic alternatives. but if you're attacking ones that already work and pushing ones that don't work, you're obviously subversive
at this point its unverifiable where it is true or not, absent a time machine. so its just another potential axiom. the only question, then, is whether it works or not
if you dont want to be an obvious LARP, you need a memetic complex with 2.1+ birth rates if you are going to spend time deconstructing one with 2.1+ birth rates.
@Panikooooos You can find male cell lines in women, even those who have never been pregnant. Just as we have bacteria, etc., living inside of us, we have other human genetic lines doing the same.
The further you stray from the normal sort of reproductive processes the rarer / more freak accident something gets obviously, but with active male cell lines living inside women it isn't impossible to get some crossover.
he has a telegram channel that gets thousands of views within seconds every time he posts a message @ScaredForLife even without twitter and youtube he'd be fine
the problem with the deplatforming thing is that its not a rule or not. we need a law that says either freedom of association is allowed, or it isn't. im ok with either really, but it has to be one way or the other
atheists are like anti-vaxxers. you want to encourage the herd to provide you immunity, even if you think personally the risk/reward is not there. it isn't rational to be openly anti-vaxxer (let the plebs take on the risks to provide you immunity) and it isn't rational to be openly atheist
the appropriate way to deal with the JQ is to advocate policy like banning usury. if they do in fact dominate systems of degeneracy, you win by banning it. if you're wrong, you still win.
@Deleted User the left is very anti-israel and pro-palestine, in part because they get woke from how BDS is treated. it is an optics game. if you attack usury, and the jew attacks you, then you have the high ground to normies
@Deleted User most things that you don't like, most other people don't like either. usury laws have been very popular for 1500 years in europe. if you ban bad behavior, and coalesce around that, then people who insist on behaving poorly will dig their own grave. you have to do these things in the proper order and with the right focus though
182 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next
