Message from @Karu
Discord ID: 599335036634005510
oh yes
actually there are some translated
i just saw them
Can you send some links? <:shockedcat:591726182010191872>
Damn, just after I found a copy on my own too
:p
Do you go to church if you're sick
How sick are we talking?
Well I haven't got the plague
It's just I'm sick now because of some kids who were sick in church last Sunday
Damn kids...
Don't wanna continue the cycle ya feel
If you've just got the sniffles, that isn't an excuse.
Understandable
@Deleted User that's how the demons get you
@Wrath Father Ripperger is an Exorcist and he has videos on YT
@Helter Seltzer ☧ correct
Need to check my understanding here. Is a good tl;dr of sede logic, since John XXIII was a heretic, every pope/bishop/etc since he came into power invalid?
Stop worrying so much about whether or not whatever pope is considered a heretic for whatever. Heretics are people like Arius, or Luther, etc. Pope have been wrong and corrected all the time since Peter
Alexander VI
@Karu Vatican II is heresy and until it is revoked all Popes are complicit in heresy and therefore invalid.
Popes are not invalid because they defend something that is wrong
I don't agree with sedes
But that is what he wanted to know
Ah, I see, that was the sede logic
Yes
Me right now: <:wojakbrainlet1:510858664534474752>
Sedes are dumb too dw
You're still autism supreme in my eyes <3
They are just tired
>I don’t agree with sedes
>presents sedes argument
I was asking whether that was an accurate summation of their position, not whether sedeism is legit or not
She was precisely mentioning what were the sde arguments
Oh ok
Dumb dumb
There was this sede who lasted here like some hours who, when pressed, said that Paul was whatever because he contradicted Peter, and nobody can contradict the Pope because of course the Pope is always right
So he had no idea how papal infallibility works basically