>not doing Aramaic Communion

Because it is a liturgical abuse. When seeking reverence we ought to not to touch the eucharist if we are not consecrated to do so

aramaic is a rite

it's ok too

Someone may say

>ooga booga but the apostles did it!

Lol

Because they were apostles, so I would say that counts as consecrated

Not to mention they were having an actual dinner etc

So considering these things

It is no surprise

<:eksdee:558283291292336138>

Look. As a Catholic just starting out, I would prefer English prayer so I can understand what is going on.

That the removal of these two things is perfectly correlated with the greatest age of moral filth, liturgical abuse, and pathetic state of the Church

>roman missals are translated

I want to be in harmony with prayer

@Iakovos You prefer it in short term, but in long term it is better. One can also use a misal, and the homily is always in the vernacular tongue

I would give everything to have a Latin rite Parish

I would also argue

I WANT TO HE IN HARMONY WITH PRAYER UNTIL I LEARN LATIN REEEEE

Missals are lit

silence and get your mantilla

I'm good with the current.

That in a latin mass, the mere fact that you have to talk a foreign language makes people be more aware of what they say

Idk what a mantilla is

Instead of entering auto mode

Wel

f e m o i d

Damn

woah don't insult my nigga

I need to learn Latin. I'm not saying we shouldn't do Latin mass. But for those just coming into the Church I would like for it to be English. Mass nearly brought me to tears, and I was shocked to see people want to leave so early rather than fellowship with their brothers and sisters in Christ.

ok

@Deleted User yeah i have a problem with that

with

Guys

receiving

I’m going to mass

the body of christ

on the hand

my priest even said that

@Deleted User 🙌🙌