Finally, some good fucking theology

@Mozalbete ⳩

This guy still posting? <:bruh:569616839340982272>

I really need Mozal's big brain take tbh

I would settle for @MawLr though

<:eksdee:558283291292336138> <:eksdee:558283291292336138> <:eksdee:558283291292336138> <:eksdee:558283291292336138>

I’m done

DarkMatter has been debunked so many times

That's the thing about most atheists though.

They don't understand much about the bible, or certain denominations.

And then they'll say something that's been debunked, and sit there all proud and when you try to debate them they'll just scream "SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS!"

>be zuckerfag
>block me from posting from my page
>demand phone number or authenticator app
>scan authenticator and enter the code
>"code incorrect"
Nice try zucc, you're not getting my phone nubmer

Thats a new one for me

I think the one of the reasons why sex is “good” which I’m guessing DarkMatter’s definition is pleasure has to be the fact that we are corporeal however still having needs and desires

I’m going to use the Thomist position on this

and one quote from him

"Wherefore the natural order requires that man should make use of these pleasures, in so far as they are necessary for man's well-being, as regards the preservation either of the individual or of the species."

Summa Theologaie

Lust propels us to fill our basic operation of reproducing

Remember, you cannot put sex in the same definition or category as pleasure

However you can easily blinded by lust

Aquinas noted this as the daughters of lust

This is known as the blindness of the mind

Where as “simple [act of] understanding, which apprehends some end as good… is hindered by lust.”

We know that having too much sex is bad

but people still engage in the act because it feels “good”

even though they don’t carry out the natural operation as intended by nature

to put it simply, God made it in this manner for us rational humans to carry out a necessary function for preservation

But it can be easily subverted to the point where sex becomes something else

Where it’s not even sex, it’s just pleasure

It’s not sinful to engage in these sexual pleasure as you are carrying out the necessary function as it intends to do (in marriage of course)

B r u h

we are just by nature

If God real, why sex feel good

because preservation?

if god real, why Thomas Aquinas wrong

If God real why he no have same morals as me

really need to get me that book

summa theologie

I have a pdf of it on my phone

send it