Message from @Mozalbete ⳩
Discord ID: 464110546594299934
Very nice
how did you manage that?
I raised the question of how far would we take "love is love", and when the teacher cited that that only applies to adults I said that the age of consent is only 16 (in UK at least)
So your teacher was basically saying that children do not love
Ouch.
I have an entirely new perspective on my childhood now.
It was quite funny tbh
how are you my niggas
Doing fine.
In Leipzig
Evening
Hey
Y
Tired and out of loop
how can we change this in the Romish churches?
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/clericalism-and-corruption/
Thank you
@Kike of Kaifeng You sound like the dreaded American convertodox
@Wzl I'm Anglican
But I think this is just a problem that Romanists will want to change, and I wonder what can be done
what does that even mean?
Roman catholics I assume
@Wzl he's neither lol, anglican from china
@Deleted User He is even more worse then. @Kike of Kaifeng When are you finally swimming the Tiber or are you that 'special autistic kind' of Chinese from Hongkong?
If God did anything to america, he'd curse it, not bless it.
America = the great satan
Neo Sodom
Hald the world is Neo Sodom, though
the whore of babylon
@Deleted User @Wzl I live in America
It is the Whore of Babylon, or at least a whore of Babylon
@de ton America richly deserves to be destroyed several times over for its acquiescence to and embrace of globohomo
Its cities are worse than Sodom and Gomorrah
But yes, @Wzl, I do have a connexion to Hong Kong, namely that my father was born there and baptized in an Anglican church when he read the Bible to get ready for a debate and was convinced by the Holy Spirit of his sinfulness before God and his need for a spotless Saviour of infinite merits
I don't know what autistic Hongkongers you've seen, and autistic Calvinists, of whom there are many; but I'm decidedly not autistic, even figuratively
Although I have done some rather mechanical work such as copyediting
As for when, or rather if, I'll swim the Tiber
I refer you to the able defences of the Protestant doctrine of justification by John Davenant, Lord Bishop of Sarum, and of the legitimacy of the Reformed Church of England by Richard Field
Reading Davenant, you will not easily think Bellarmine was the clear victor in their scholastic debate on justification, and indeed Bellarmine himself respected Davenant enough that, it is sometimes reported, he kept a portrait of Davenant in his study; and if Bellarmine respected Davenant, I do not suppose many moderns have the quali to judge Davenant an autistic idiot
As for the doctrine of the eucharist, I think perhaps the best book is Daniel Waterland's *Review of the Doctrine of the Eucharist*