Message from @Orrbit

Discord ID: 572885620276330527


2019-04-30 19:35:47 UTC  

@Jay Dubya im sorry im messing with you in my autistic ways

2019-04-30 19:36:00 UTC  

@CRYSS ⳩ i heard

2019-04-30 19:36:14 UTC  

i hope sarah becomes pope

2019-04-30 19:36:20 UTC  

karaboga in the vatican lmao

2019-04-30 19:57:53 UTC  

Cdl. Burke for pope

2019-04-30 19:58:22 UTC  

any of those two tbh

2019-04-30 20:04:11 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435520935647248414/572875872923811882/C9L9wkEUAAAsCHA.jpg

2019-04-30 20:04:41 UTC  

Mfw i have to defend the perpetual virginity of the Theotokos every single day from dumb prots

2019-04-30 20:13:18 UTC  

Tfw no Fr. Youngtrad to become Bishop of Rome

2019-04-30 20:16:06 UTC  

Tfw the orthodoxy starts shitting on your pope *Latin Empire intensifies*

2019-04-30 20:18:51 UTC  

Tfw the Tsar won’t come back

2019-04-30 20:21:43 UTC  

the craziest prot i knew was some non denom thot who unironically said that Christ was gay because he had a homosexual affair with Peter

2019-04-30 20:27:42 UTC  

Perpetual virginity/immaculate conception I honestly don't get, isn't the point of Mary that she was a completely normal human being who had more kids after Jesus? Seems like it would cheapen Christ's human nature to necessitate some kind of special-made divine vessel to come into the world to redeem normal sinners.

2019-04-30 20:28:32 UTC  

Not to start WWIII or anything, but honestly I've just never understood the reasoning

2019-04-30 20:29:27 UTC  

It cheapens christ's divine nature to suggest she had children with a normal man after literally birthing God

2019-04-30 20:30:18 UTC  

Even Martin Luther agreed that Mary was a perpetual virgin

2019-04-30 20:35:12 UTC  

Not to mention there's no scriptural basis for it

2019-04-30 20:35:48 UTC  

And no, Mary wasn't a normal human being, she was especially chosen by God

2019-04-30 20:38:32 UTC  

@SUPER MALE VITALITY™ nobody questioned perpetual virginity until the late 1600 or early 1700s

2019-04-30 20:41:20 UTC  

It's not about making sense though. It's actually just that it's a tradition that goes back very early. The reason it became important though is that Helvedius used it as a point of argument and used bad hermeneutics for his conclusions. It was more of a point about hermeneutics than anything else

2019-04-30 20:42:55 UTC  

The point of Mary was to literally bear God physically inside her like is that not a crazy thought

2019-04-30 20:42:56 UTC  

He said, look! It says "until" here (In Greek); therefore, Mary didn't remain a virgin forever. Then everyone else was like, if you apply that universally to the Bible in other spots, it destroys many passages.

2019-04-30 20:43:48 UTC  

That's why it got pushed so hard in Chrysostom and Jerome

2019-04-30 20:44:17 UTC  

I mean beyond the special choosing. I don't think Christ's divine nature has any bearing from His human parent, God is God, but if Christ needed a designer human to be who he is that would mean He is not representative of a typical human undergoing a typical human experience, which calls into question whether he is fit to serve as a model to be expected of us. Mary being a normal human reconciles that. I guess the perpetual virginity isn't as big a thing as the immaculate conception in that regard, but it's still a bit strange, especially considering Jesus had brothers

2019-04-30 20:44:34 UTC  

ooohhh here we go

2019-04-30 20:44:41 UTC  

he definitely didn't have brothers

2019-04-30 20:45:00 UTC  

thats a translation/cultural thing from the greek

2019-04-30 20:45:23 UTC  

in the ancient world and a lot of cultures today no real distinction in language was made between siblings and cousins

2019-04-30 20:45:32 UTC  

This is true

2019-04-30 20:45:38 UTC  

they use the same word they use for brother in other contexts where it can only mean cousin

2019-04-30 20:46:14 UTC  

Furthermore, it makes no sense that Jesus handed Mary to a non-blood relative when he dies if he says real brothers

2019-04-30 20:47:08 UTC  

Like, that was standard procedure at the time. The only reason he would do that is that he doesn't have any blood related brothers

2019-04-30 20:47:15 UTC  

yeah, for Jesus to give Mary to John to look after, would be a huge massive cultural disrespect for her and his family if Mary actually had other children to care for her

2019-04-30 20:48:35 UTC  

Immaculate Conception is also not supported in the early fathers though. You see it pop up in the 300s if I recall and the EO, OO, Nestorians, and Luther believe in Immaculate Purification instead

2019-04-30 20:49:49 UTC  

All of this is addressed here http://newadvent.org/fathers/3007.htm

2019-04-30 20:50:11 UTC  

You see things pop up when people oppose them so there is a need for writtings about it

2019-04-30 20:50:27 UTC  

Or when a topic first comes up

2019-04-30 20:51:04 UTC  

But still, the authority of something is not whether or not a Church Father said something. That is a good guide for most things but there are authoritative proclamations that are above those

2019-04-30 20:53:53 UTC  

Makes sense I guess, honestly the more I mull it over, it doesn't have nearly the issues immaculate conception has, more just a quirk of tradition that isn't easy to clearly justify

2019-04-30 20:54:47 UTC  

But I'll read the link, Marian issues in general just tend to give me pause seeing how quickly their corruptions introduce cancer into the church

2019-04-30 20:56:01 UTC  

Being weary of something tends to do that