yes

Let's purposefully ignore the fact that the eastern Sees were eager to ditch Rome

okay only because i dont know much about the subject. I heard theologically it was necesary.

It's a distinction

im kidding

It was to combat Arianism which was popping up in Iberia

No it wasn't

we got all your cool liturgies too

Literally was

Arianism was stopped on an earlier date and I even have a book about that, excuse me for a minute

omg i guess i gotta drop the predator missle

Bruh theres aryan churches out there today

*predator missle incoming*
https://youtu.be/_Rrzo55G364

Regardless of why the Creed was changed, it was changed without consent of the other Patriarchs, without a council, done completely uncanonically

besides comsent was it not necesary?

Yes, following the laws of the church is necessary

stopped in the council of Nicaea

325 ad

Officially condemned in Nicea yes

bruh, east-west happened in 1054

It was officially condemned as heresy, but as I said, there are still adherents to Arianism today

and?

Yeah, we condemn heresy but that doesn't mean it stops.

So there were adherents popping up in Iberia ~500 years later

You said that Filioque was established to combat Arrianism

Correct, at the council of Toledo

Council of Constantinople

381 AD

Do you not understand what I'm saying?

You're both wrong. We should all become Jehovah's Witnesses

yes I agree Watch tower gang gang

New World Translation = Best translation

Praise be to Jehovah

Fuck it let's all be mormons

I want 4 wives

Hey, multiple wives

What can go wrong

@Jay Dubya how are you not pastafarian

let's all be mudslimes, 72 virgins in paradise