Unlike Rome that pretty much every King kneeled to

Rome was only 1/5 of the Patriarchates, it didnt have any special powers

Dude

Mate, it was you guys that broke off

Yeah ok we'll pretend Charlemagne didnt demand coronation lmao

@Jay Dubya yet having more screen time in the new testament

The Roman patriarchy has always been the prime one

double mind you

Every Saint prior to the schism knew this

The first amongst equals was the title, equals being the operative word. Not superior, equal.

The pope agreed to crown Charlemagne because his family had proved to be God's tools, stopping the Muslims at Tours and such

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GEAS6l86nc

I refuse to watch because I already know the answer.

1v4, yes it was totally us who broke off lmao

unironically yes

mainly because 4/5 Sees were connected to Byzantium

mfw eastern liturgies cool now with Supreme Pontiff, whos reuniting who now

I respect you lads a lot, but being blind to history is just a meme

"Hey we never agreed to add the filioque to the Creed, you cant just do that it violates the canons"

"Fuck yall I do what I want, I'm the pope"

And so schism happened.

oversimplifying

Is it though?

yes

Let's purposefully ignore the fact that the eastern Sees were eager to ditch Rome

okay only because i dont know much about the subject. I heard theologically it was necesary.

It's a distinction

im kidding

It was to combat Arianism which was popping up in Iberia

No it wasn't

we got all your cool liturgies too

Literally was

Arianism was stopped on an earlier date and I even have a book about that, excuse me for a minute

omg i guess i gotta drop the predator missle

Bruh theres aryan churches out there today

*predator missle incoming*
https://youtu.be/_Rrzo55G364

Regardless of why the Creed was changed, it was changed without consent of the other Patriarchs, without a council, done completely uncanonically

besides comsent was it not necesary?

Yes, following the laws of the church is necessary

stopped in the council of Nicaea