"Not another fecking Sede"? Are there others here as well?

They don't last very long here

And I have other social circles in which there are Sedes

Never met one that hasn't had a personality disorder.

Ok, so this isn't really a trad Christian server at all, just a conservative novus ordo, protard, and orthofag server.
Nice ad hom, faggot.

shh

sedes are just orthodox in denial \

Lmao, no most Catholics here go to the tridentine mass when possible

And yeah sedes are *literally* protestant

no u

>Not going to Sarum Use

What is wrong with you, pleb?

<:thinksmirk:564102152239185920>

Conservative novus ordo is still novus ordo, and novus ordo isn't Catholic. You novus ordo niggers always call sedes protestant but you literally believe that infiltrators with the intent of destroying the Church from within, and their successors, are somehow magically Catholic. You're closer to protards than sedes are, believing obvious lies. You're just as bad as mormons in that regard.

Pretty much

Heresy has consequences

Imagine believing that Sedvacantism isn't just Donatism with a fancy name.

@Christus obnube Liberatoris It's good to see that at least someone here is capable of using their sense of reason.

In <#557359532838354944> yesterday we were discussing the ramifications of the order of malta forcing the new rite on their members

It was not a happy discussion

Weird that the doctors of the church taught donatism

Donatism only applies to low ranking clergy, like priests and bishops. Divine law prohibits a heretic from becoming, or staying, a pope.

@Deleted User I see you’re making friends

I don’t think you know what Donatism is, did they still hold jurisdiction in the church during their schism?

@Deleted User The head of the order can flex however he likes.

But he can't stop people giving the mass.

@Mac tíre iarain Not really, I know Elias from another server.

Forgive me because this might be obvious, but why does Novus Ordo even exist? I'm reading the catechism now and it continually speaks of tradition. The new rite isn't that which was always done, no?

St Augustine explicitly rejects that idea and it wasn’t until the donatists were reconciled and repented of their heresy that their jurisdiction was restored

@Deleted User Bugini trying to bring Lutherans and Jews into the fold.

So it has no actual theological foundation?

Not a great one, no.

But this Protestant mass doesn’t contain errors or anything harmful <:ohyou2:569616856105877505>

What the heck

Take into account there are quotes of members of the concillium removing prayers from the orders of mass because they "sounded bad".

@Deleted User Yes, the new rite only became a thing in the 60s. That's why they call it the new rite. As for why the Novus Ordo exists:

The promulgation of a new rite was actually condemned and the wrath of Peter and Paul are upon those who formulated the new mass according to St Pius V

May they all be saints soon.

@Christus obnube Liberatoris Absolutely, and not just for the mass but also for ordinations and consecrations., meaning that priests and bishops ordained/consecrated in the new rite are not valid and thus are laymen.

How is a Christian supposed to deal with aggressive people, or people who are constantly hostile?