i doubt impregnation fetish is that uncommon

Well, of course not. It should be par for the course, really.

@Mozalbete ⳩ does this mean images of Jesus are forbidden by the second commandment?

That is not what the secind commandment says nor means. That is iconoclasy. I recomment taking a look at the seventh ecumenical council

Overall there is a huge nonsense there

anathema to those who want to apoly Scripture about idols to venerable images

Isn't this the first commandment though?

And the second is do not take the Lord's name in vain?

Like, that whole section is the first commandment, you have to read it in context

I think sometimes they are joined or separated

But sure one had to keeo context in mind

And of course, without cintext it also follows we cant have any image at all of anythung

And to call venerable inages that glorify God idolatry is perverse

With the context it tells us not to worship anyone but God

Which is why there is a difference between Worship, which belongs to God alone, and veneration.

With images of Jesus, if you are worshipping the physical image then that is idolatry, same as it would be to worship a bull made of gold.

But we don't worship the image, we use them to remind us of God's great love and sacrifice.

that is obvious for everyone

Not prots tho

As said, the text of the 7th ecumenical council is very clear

@ninjacats does that answer your question

today was a bruh moment

I tried to hook up my friend with a construction job because my broker owns a contracting company

he did good at the interview but didn't even bother to show up day 1

well, does the 7th ecumenical council go against the bible then?

i mean it says you shouldn't even make it, let alone venerate it

No, those who try to apply what is said about idols to venerable images go against Christ

I see that you have, as your avatar, an image of a thing from the earth below

Overall

>iconoclasy
lmao. Here are some extracts:
-

"All the childish devices and mad ravings which have been falsely written against the venerable images, must be delivered up to the Episcopium of Constantinople, that they may be locked away with other heretical books. And if anyone is found hiding such books, if he be a bishop or presbyter or deacon, let him be deposed; but if he be a monk or layman, let him be anathema."

"And, forsooth, following profane men, led astray by their carnal sense, they have calumniated the Church of Christ our God, which he has espoused to himself, and have failed to distinguish between holy and profane, styling the images of our Lord and of his Saints by the same name as the statues of diabolical idols"

@ninjacats etc etc. Inoclasy is a modernist madness similar to a stupid child crying "IDOOOOLS ASDSFDGDEFQ". If the people around you defend it, I think you will find this and many more things said in the council completely reasonable. You should comment it to both

The Bible says you shouldn't make idols. The moment you admit they are venerated because of what they represent, you admit they aren't idols

https://twitter.com/OzraeliAvi/status/1168668085961641984?s=19

I love London 🇬🇧

Tfw will never bump into the lizard lady and exchange a few words with her
Why even live.

Also, <a:56_gif:595175754036281345>

https://metro.co.uk/2019/08/31/us-tourists-fail-to-recognise-queen-during-chat-with-the-monarch-at-balmoral-10662719/

Bro ebig

Ameriga destroyed

Wholesome