So until it becomes that you can't get rid of the baby, it's still hot and has no strings attached

gross

Fair

<:disgusting:590166996654489603>

I should clarify that I looked into a lot of fetishes out of curiosity, and that this is in no way my opinion

Jeez.

Where could you have possibly read about it?

I was in a fetish group on facebook, asked the right questions and talked to the right people

Whoa.

Now **that's** fucked.

People who are obsessed with hedonism don't care about the consequences their actions entail

The fetishisation of impregnation isn't entirely healthy, though.

It's not so much a willingness to create life as it is an unhealthy association with the *feeling* of reproduction.

If I've ever heard anyone talk about an impregnation fetish before, it's usually a woman who's on Birth control.

Quite incredible they can't see the forest for the trees.

fetish by itself means that its disorderly

This is gross

Having a factual conversation behind the psychological and spiritual imbalances of modern sexuality is gross?

You'd never last in a working class pub, sweetheart.

like, it means that you value the thing more than its place in the harmonious grand scheme of things

although i suppose someone with just the fetish and no history of acting on it might be workable material for a flirt-to-convert mission

I think the biggest hang up in the woman having acted on it is the fact she's had other partners, not so much the preference in and of itself.

well, a woman getting knocked up just to abort/give out for adoptoon is a hard pass

multiple partners is also bad

Ah, we're back to that. I thought we were talking about impregnation alone.

well, worf was saying that its kind of a package deal

which makes sense sadly

?

I must have missed that part, I'll scroll up in a moment.

Ah, right. Om.

Ok*

In that context, I see the point.

However, I'd that that is quite niche behaviour; abhorrent, but niche. For now, anyway.

Going back to my point about impregnation fetishists being on birth control, I would seriously doubt they're trying to create life and terminate it as a part of the fetish.

yeah its just hormonal craziness

i doubt impregnation fetish is that uncommon

Well, of course not. It should be par for the course, really.

@Mozalbete ⳩ does this mean images of Jesus are forbidden by the second commandment?

That is not what the secind commandment says nor means. That is iconoclasy. I recomment taking a look at the seventh ecumenical council

Overall there is a huge nonsense there

anathema to those who want to apoly Scripture about idols to venerable images