The fetishisation of impregnation isn't entirely healthy, though.

It's not so much a willingness to create life as it is an unhealthy association with the *feeling* of reproduction.

If I've ever heard anyone talk about an impregnation fetish before, it's usually a woman who's on Birth control.

Quite incredible they can't see the forest for the trees.

fetish by itself means that its disorderly

This is gross

Having a factual conversation behind the psychological and spiritual imbalances of modern sexuality is gross?

You'd never last in a working class pub, sweetheart.

like, it means that you value the thing more than its place in the harmonious grand scheme of things

although i suppose someone with just the fetish and no history of acting on it might be workable material for a flirt-to-convert mission

I think the biggest hang up in the woman having acted on it is the fact she's had other partners, not so much the preference in and of itself.

well, a woman getting knocked up just to abort/give out for adoptoon is a hard pass

multiple partners is also bad

Ah, we're back to that. I thought we were talking about impregnation alone.

well, worf was saying that its kind of a package deal

which makes sense sadly

?

I must have missed that part, I'll scroll up in a moment.

Ah, right. Om.

Ok*

In that context, I see the point.

However, I'd that that is quite niche behaviour; abhorrent, but niche. For now, anyway.

Going back to my point about impregnation fetishists being on birth control, I would seriously doubt they're trying to create life and terminate it as a part of the fetish.

yeah its just hormonal craziness

i doubt impregnation fetish is that uncommon

Well, of course not. It should be par for the course, really.

@Mozalbete ⳩ does this mean images of Jesus are forbidden by the second commandment?

That is not what the secind commandment says nor means. That is iconoclasy. I recomment taking a look at the seventh ecumenical council

Overall there is a huge nonsense there

anathema to those who want to apoly Scripture about idols to venerable images

Isn't this the first commandment though?

And the second is do not take the Lord's name in vain?

Like, that whole section is the first commandment, you have to read it in context

I think sometimes they are joined or separated

But sure one had to keeo context in mind

And of course, without cintext it also follows we cant have any image at all of anythung

And to call venerable inages that glorify God idolatry is perverse

With the context it tells us not to worship anyone but God

Which is why there is a difference between Worship, which belongs to God alone, and veneration.

With images of Jesus, if you are worshipping the physical image then that is idolatry, same as it would be to worship a bull made of gold.