Message from @BasedWhiteGoy
Discord ID: 383463550666014721
Neither of those ideas are compatible with fascism
Namely, a lower house that is democratically elected, the franchise being by occupation
There's also a Senate, whose members are appointed from among the elite by the Dictator
Dude this is gr88
Fascism is about subordinating yourself and your interests to the good of the nation. It puts the individual last when it comes to social organization.
The NS Parliament, however, is purely economic
Wait wtf I was replying to something else
```
Instead of democracy’s parliamentary system, we will have an economic parliamentof the National Socialist state. It will be chosen by the totality of the working German people. Everyone will have a vote. This election, however, will not involve parliamentary parties, but rather by the great professions within the people’s community. German professions are organized down to the smallest detail, and provide the guarantee that each working German will have the right to have his will, his accomplishments, and his responsibility taken into consideration by the state. The economic parliament will manage economic policy, not state policy.
That will be managed by the Senate. It will consist of about 200 personalities, chosen by the dictator from all groups and classes. It will lead the state. These 200 will be the elite from the whole people. They will provide the government with advice and support. They will be appointed for life. In the event of death, another will be appointed.
The senate will select the chancellor. He will have full responsibility for the whole policy of the Reich, both domestic and foreign. He will be ready to give his life for that policy if necessary.
The chancellor will choose his ministers and officials. He will also have full responsibility over them, which means he can appoint and fire them at will.
```
Interesting idea
Mind you, for the time being, a wholesale rejection of the democratic principle is our best course
I agree.
In the future National Socialist state, we can introduce elements of populism as are appropriate, but in the present, democracy is synonymous with liberalism
Heidegger explicitly said "only individuals are creative (even to lead), the crowd never"
Illiberal democracy is a thing, but it's considered the exception
One big problem I had with GLR was that he tried to fit traditionally american values in to national socialism, when the two are at odds in almost every way
So if you listen to GLR alone, which a lot of spergs do, you become confused about what fascism and NS actually is
He was right to try
His failure is why we know it can't work
reading what GLR said about how the Founding Fathers were actually Fascists makes me cringe
GLR speaks in simple terms, which makes him a good orator, but also means that a lot gets lost in translation
How you can believe that is beyond me
If a man as great as GLR couldn't make it work, then none of us will be able to
@BasedWhiteGoy to counter what you say about Heidegger, there exists the "hive mind analysis" phenomenon, where groups of people making predictions about something are usually better than an individual
Though I do think that if he hadn't been murdered, there's a good chance he would have become Governor
Fascism, intellectually, sprung from a rejection of modernity and the enlightenment. Almost every major fascist philosopher was very explicit about that
He was murdered by the fucking feds because he made so much sense
GLR failed because he was fucking assassinated.
The founders created a nation steeped in modernity
for example, it's been shown that when a bunch of people play a "guess the weight game", their answers, while varying wildly, will always average out very close to the true value
(((They))) knew GLR was redpilling too many too fast.
the same is true of other things
the problem is
of course
the mob
the effect is ruined when someone's decision making is influenced by everyone else's
which is why democracy often doesn't experience that effect
The hivemind is consistent with fascism. No one said that people wouldn't pool their collective intellect and efforts to advance the nation, in fact that is what fascism is all about
But the leader that the people elevate and will in to power gets the final say
Fascism is a sort of third way between democracy and total dictatorship. Usually a fascist dictator ought to be and is a charismatic, strong person that is beloved by the people
I can't wait for the day when I can catch a flight out of George Lincoln Rockwell Airport