Message from @IImploreYouToRemoveYourself
Discord ID: 589938263511531582
Tim's claim that they should get paid the same because they're doing the same job at a different shop is stupid. They're doing similar jobs, but not the same job. The fact that they lost to high school boys illustrates that. The NBA runs a development league called the G league. According to what Tim is saying, they should get paid the same as the main NBA player, that's stupid. They may both being playing basketball, but they don't play at the same level (so not the same job), and they don't make the same amount of money.
Also this stupid claim that people would watch if they made the same and poured into marketing is also Lame. If that were true, we could also make boys U-15 soccer just as big as the pros by marketing better, but we all know that isn't true because we all know people want to watch the highest level of the game.
https://youtu.be/HBfv5cH1OdU
_"I am the Hand Of God... ¿What have you become?"_
if women soccer players get paid the same proportion the men bring in, the women would get a sizable pay cut. if it was for equal time on the field, they'd get a pay cut cuz men don't get paid if they don't play, like due to injuries or suspensions
if women tennis players got equal pay for each set they played, they'd lose 40% of their prize money(3 sets vs 5 for men) - they currently get the same prize money and because they play less sets, they can compete in more comps at an event
We know its not about equality, its about special privilege.
alternative headline: Delta refuses to boycott the state of its biggest hub and headquarters
fuckin morons - lol
Taylor swift and Kesha basically have the same job. Why aren’t they paid the same?
Obviously people buy more of Taylor Swift’s songs.
Exact same with men’s and women’s soccer
But that's not equitable
Womp womp
Lol
Do you remember? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=monFrbRDa6w
I saw a thread on Reddit the other day asking who could beat Trump. I thought about replying, but it was pretty clear from all the replies that it was just a leftist hugbox and anything I said would just be downvoted and ignored.
Maybe it's not as solid a rule as I think it is, but for the last sixty years or so, the only times a president failed to get reelected was when consumers didn't have faith in the economy.
not happy about this one (outside of obvious situations like during a burn banning). As much as I think that people that burn the american flag are awful people who don't understand how great our country is, I still think they should be allowed to do so, as long as they aren't doing it in a way that harms other people
agreed
The flag burners just make themselves look stupid anyways
Idk. I think if you burn the flag of the country you live in, you should probably have your citizenship revoked.
Obviously it could be a slippery slope though, so I probs wouldn't support it actually being written into law.
the one thing I _will_ grant to trump and the people pursuing this is - at least they're taking the right avenue (making it an amendment, instead of just legislating it into being)
He didn't make an amendment to ban bump stocks.
no, and I have a problem with that
I don't like this proposal either, but at LEAST they're intending to use the right avenues to attempt to put it into action
At least it's a constitutional amendment so there's little chance it will pass
@wolfman1911 the only one who can beat trump is niki haley, spread the word :)
Hot Damn, there was a lot more to that case than I knew