Message from @IImploreYouToRemoveYourself
Discord ID: 591678362385252367
Ya :)
Parents should be held liable for their childrens actions if they did not take appropriate action
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/News/video/parents-charged-school-shooting-incident-63830330
I think i disagree.
im with shadows on this one
I think they should be held liable only if they say they never saw it coming.
they should be charged with something like criminal negligence if it is actually criminal negligence
thats a civil issue tho
if the gun was unsecured and the kid had open access to it. A gun he cannot legally obtain on his own. Then yes the parents are liable for his actions with the gun. Children are both responsible for the health of their children and liable for the actions of their children because it is deemed that the children are not mature enough to make adult decisions for themselves. As such parents can hand out liberties to children in a controlled way to help prepare them for emancipation. So parents are liable if those liberties are handed out to soon or inappropriately. For example, you may be able to drive a car legally at 16 but that requires parent permission (they are the body that determines if your mature enough to drive).
In this case the parents would need to approve they took appropriate action to secure the gun especially given the kids psychiatric history. If they can't prove that, they will be held liable if not for aiding, certainly they should be held liable for neglecting.
^^^
We moved that chat to the debate channel.
I moved the contents of my bowels to the toilet @Shadows
better there than debate channel I guess
Youtube what are you doing?
Youtube STAHP!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfldS5hqWYA
Why the fuck would it recommend this?
I didn't get that.. I don't want to know what you been looking at Radspakr..
Donate in the name of your liberal friends
it was a strange one all my other recommendations are EFAP and animal videos, which I'm fine with I like Animal videos I saw a cool one of bears swimming in someone's pool earlier
tl;dw : Jussie Smolett case gets special prosecutor, kim foxx's conduct included in scope of investigation
And this is why people fear hoodies
https://abcn.ws/2WVB5io
1. This wasn't an ambush, just an attack.
2. The fucking ad was twice as long as the video. π π π π Disrespectful. π π π π
Anyways... π This looks like a probing attack, to give a serious a better chance.
Hang him in public as a warning.
They should have called the police the second they saw a hoodie. Its phx, its already over 100 degrees outside, id freak out if i saw someone in a trench coat in this weather also
<#266400976267640833> Were fucked
don't forget that they specifically also added "gaming addiction" as a disorder, too π Definitely no agenda, there
@Putz
ΒΏPHX huh? Ya. Ya, that should have drawn attention...
π
Can't watch right now, how about a summary?
As much as his rabid fans think Crowder should give him legitimacy by debating him, I assume he's licking Maza's asshole hard.
if gender dysphoria is no longer considered a medical disorder, insurers have leverage to exclude any treatments related to it
It sounded like they were changing it from a mental problem to a physical one. Which sounds like they want HRT and SRS to be easier to acquire as a result. But I also didn't read up on the reclassification
i don't see how it would be considered a physical disorder. mental disorders have physiological symptoms like depression. it's not like being paralyzed
@Legalize while the mentally ill do need help, this is the future these activists wanted. i don't feel sympathy
I'm guessing it had more to do with political activism than old-fashioned science, so treating it like a physical ailment means that changing your body is the "cure"
i don't think that argument is going to convince insurance underwriters