Message from @scaevola
Discord ID: 591605722081525761
... if it doesn't mean shit then how does it do the first thing?
that person raped me
this no evidence thing sure is convinient
*Law and Order sound intensifies*
Look at those white cis males getting triggered once their power structure is questioned.. we see u
NO MORE EVIDENCE
if there's no standard of evidence, if there's no debate and no platform for dissenters than there's no accountability they can do whatever fucked up shit they want and and never face consequences.
They can even use those lack of standards to oppress people all while playing at being virtuous
it's no wonder progressivism seems to attract so many rapists, pedos and all round evil people
it's an interesting approach to authoritarianism since traditionally it would be very much in favour of strict rules so I wonder how they square that circle
is the aim to basically let people do whatever they want except seek justice for wrongs?
is the end goal for them complete anarchy like in certain black or muslim neighbours where cops don't go or do they use the police to hold everyone in check, who falls on what side of that line?
can there be such a thing as state enforced anarchy?
a few years ago I would just put that down to an oxymoron but it does seem to be the intent
They like strict rules, just not the rules and policies supported by evidence
so everyone is at the whim of the ones in charge and they designate who is the protected class and who is not
and they all seem to think it'll be them in charge
reject any authority or heirarchy that doesn't have them in charge
Dear leader Cenk
maybe it's taken me this long to formulate these thoughts because I assumed better of people, that's a mistake I guess
Of course authoritarians think they'll be in charge, they wouldnt advocate for being pushed around themselves now would they?
i try not to kink shame 😄
>I assumed better of people
you kindhearted cutieboy
I'm still not completely blackpilled
*just hear me out guys. It's a fasces, but with snakes*
thats a lot of spice you got there
It doesn't mean shit, i.e it means everything but not shit
all those libertarian fascists showing their colours now
>I didn't appeal to those who would vote third party
>why didn't they vote for me!?!!?!!
Shocking twist
My take on that superchat was exactly that argument: I'd rather vote 3rd party and lose in the hopes that one of the major parties decides they can pick up those votes by changing their platform
Or rather, risk losing harder