Message from @IImploreYouToRemoveYourself
Discord ID: 591623633911414786
can there be such a thing as state enforced anarchy?
a few years ago I would just put that down to an oxymoron but it does seem to be the intent
They like strict rules, just not the rules and policies supported by evidence
so everyone is at the whim of the ones in charge and they designate who is the protected class and who is not
and they all seem to think it'll be them in charge
reject any authority or heirarchy that doesn't have them in charge
Dear leader Cenk
maybe it's taken me this long to formulate these thoughts because I assumed better of people, that's a mistake I guess
Of course authoritarians think they'll be in charge, they wouldnt advocate for being pushed around themselves now would they?
i try not to kink shame 😄
>I assumed better of people
you kindhearted cutieboy
I'm still not completely blackpilled
*just hear me out guys. It's a fasces, but with snakes*
thats a lot of spice you got there
all those libertarian fascists showing their colours now
>I didn't appeal to those who would vote third party
>why didn't they vote for me!?!!?!!
Shocking twist
My take on that superchat was exactly that argument: I'd rather vote 3rd party and lose in the hopes that one of the major parties decides they can pick up those votes by changing their platform
Or rather, risk losing harder
But that may also be because I don't have faith in either major party for the issues I consider most important, and don't like their policies on most other issues. I supposedly only align with the GOP about 50% and the Democrats <20%
People "settling" is why the parties are so shit
Libertarian Fascists rise!
That's not bad, actually...
I'd laugh so hard if that were real statistics
@ComingVirus, *¡No, **YOU'RE** HIRED!*
