this no evidence thing sure is convinient

*Law and Order sound intensifies*

Look at those white cis males getting triggered once their power structure is questioned.. we see u

NO MORE EVIDENCE

if there's no standard of evidence, if there's no debate and no platform for dissenters than there's no accountability they can do whatever fucked up shit they want and and never face consequences.
They can even use those lack of standards to oppress people all while playing at being virtuous

it's no wonder progressivism seems to attract so many rapists, pedos and all round evil people

it's an interesting approach to authoritarianism since traditionally it would be very much in favour of strict rules so I wonder how they square that circle
is the aim to basically let people do whatever they want except seek justice for wrongs?

is the end goal for them complete anarchy like in certain black or muslim neighbours where cops don't go or do they use the police to hold everyone in check, who falls on what side of that line?

can there be such a thing as state enforced anarchy?
a few years ago I would just put that down to an oxymoron but it does seem to be the intent

They like strict rules, just not the rules and policies supported by evidence

so everyone is at the whim of the ones in charge and they designate who is the protected class and who is not

and they all seem to think it'll be them in charge

reject any authority or heirarchy that doesn't have them in charge

Dear leader Cenk

maybe it's taken me this long to formulate these thoughts because I assumed better of people, that's a mistake I guess

Of course authoritarians think they'll be in charge, they wouldnt advocate for being pushed around themselves now would they?

i try not to kink shame 😄

>I assumed better of people

you kindhearted cutieboy

I'm still not completely blackpilled

*just hear me out guys. It's a fasces, but with snakes*

We're almost at the point where there's a Stonetoss for everything

thats a lot of spice you got there

It doesn't mean shit, i.e it means everything but not shit

all those libertarian fascists showing their colours now

😦

>I didn't appeal to those who would vote third party
>why didn't they vote for me!?!!?!!
Shocking twist

My take on that superchat was exactly that argument: I'd rather vote 3rd party and lose in the hopes that one of the major parties decides they can pick up those votes by changing their platform

Or rather, risk losing harder

But that may also be because I don't have faith in either major party for the issues I consider most important, and don't like their policies on most other issues. I supposedly only align with the GOP about 50% and the Democrats <20%

People "settling" is why the parties are so shit

Libertarian Fascists rise!

That's not bad, actually...

I'd laugh so hard if that were real statistics

@ComingVirus, *¡No, **YOU'RE** HIRED!*