I kinda wish he was my representative, except that I just looked him up and his district is in houston, so I wish he represented my district instead.

Trump probably unfollowed her for this: http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-12-19.html

Trump follows people on twitter? heh

45 people

Okay quick question

Is trump #45 or #44

because we had a president counted twice

seems he's officially counted as "45"

^

Peach Fo-Fi

Apparently Grover Cleveland counts twice.

Which is stupid

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/422693-massachusetts-college-student-asked-to-remove-anti-nazi-sign

What

Nazis are minority now

"UMass Amherst emphatically rejects Nazis, and any other hate group, a view expressed in the students’ sign." Well, the student clearly expressed hatred for a group of people different than her, and if the university is saying they agree with her, that makes them a hate group. So they ‘emphatically reject’ themselves lol

This is the problem with all this Hate speech garbage: hatred is not a good or a bad. It is neutral. The university is saying it is bad to hate Jews, but it is good to hate Nazis. So clearly hatred isn’t the issue.

https://news.sky.com/story/crouching-tiger-star-chow-yun-fat-promises-to-donate-wealth-to-charity-after-he-dies-11590907

I always liked Chow.

@Psychlops924 people really ought to be pushing the idea that banning a sign that is a crossed out swastika, they are actually defending Nazis.

I thought that's because they are NAZIs

Merry Christmas all you nazzies

Merry Christmas you filthy animal

Keep the change.

Is that Sid Vicious in your avatar?

https://twitter.com/NickRekieta/status/1077435852098281472

More "journalist" trying to get credit cards to take blame......

https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/22/worst-fake-news-stories-cnn-nbc-2018/

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-womens-march-chicago-global-march-womens-wave-20181225-story.html

https://images-ext-2.discordapp.net/external/Y9MUU4186ySxtVXGbjb1KcV2ORKEoKULP3N1TFc8bCQ/%3Fwidth%3D527%26height%3D702/https/media.discordapp.net/attachments/513907829090811909/527356484355489829/gritty_attacks_womens_march.jpg

https://www.bloombergquint.com/law-and-policy/license-to-kill-policing-to-get-a-trial-run-in-rio-de-janeiro#gs.8tDy4Kk

I've never seen an article that looked so much like it belonged on Judge Dredd rather than in reality.

https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2018/06/23/some-science-journals-that-claim-to-peer-review-papers-do-not-do-so

Oof, right in the science!

@RoadtoDawn I love how the article’s conclusion is that the ideological cessation of subscription journals may have actually caused the problem.

Hahaha yea

"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it" --Neil deGraba**

@RoadtoDawn Well. The scientific method at least. That doesn’t mean all studies are inherently true and that our current understanding of physical reality will perpetually be held the same forever. Geez. These ‘skeptics’ treat science like a religion without any form of internal criticism.

Even the scientific method has its issues. Everything requires interpreting, or a structure in which someone uses to interpret something. And even interpreting something presupposes. Naive empiricism, one of the best methodologies we have, has inherent flaws that will never go away

Basically you can sum all that up^ in this statement: you can't justify the scientific method with the scientific method

@RoadtoDawn fair point.