Message from @scaevola

Discord ID: 590273346760081437


2019-06-17 02:52:01 UTC  

putz demands his "right of the first night"

2019-06-17 03:50:37 UTC  

Guys I'm not a native english speaker can someone explain the "I WILL BE BOLD WITHOUT THE BULL" thing? I know what the words mean, but who is the bull?

2019-06-17 03:50:58 UTC  

I don't get it

2019-06-17 03:52:17 UTC  

Its a saying of being a Bull in a China shop, it is Bold, but will likely break things.

2019-06-17 03:52:46 UTC  

Or its saying that the person will be Bold without lying/Bull-shit. Its a retarded saying..... either way lol.

2019-06-17 03:53:17 UTC  

OK thanks! Still sounds terrible. I wonder if he came up with that himself.

2019-06-17 04:03:12 UTC  

@scaevola "bold without the bull"
in this context, "bull" is a sanitized way of saying the word "bullshit"
is a jab at Trump who is bold, but the left says he's full of bullshit

2019-06-17 04:03:21 UTC  

better than beto pushing to add transition surgery to medicaid

2019-06-17 11:19:09 UTC  

The more I hear him say that it sounds more and more like "bold without the bold" and I have to think for a bit to remember what he actually said

2019-06-17 16:53:19 UTC  

I thought he said bold without the bold too

2019-06-17 17:06:50 UTC  

@Agent Smith
I'm with Draco and Yuma, I could swear it was "bold w/out the bold" too...
*"¡Enunciation motherfucker, ¿do you speak it?!"*

2019-06-17 17:47:14 UTC  

What did he actually say, and does it even make any sense?

2019-06-17 17:57:12 UTC  

I heard "bold without the bol" which just doesn't make any sense to me anyway

2019-06-17 17:58:38 UTC  

But gauging by the audience's reaction (or lack thereof), I'm not alone in thinking that

2019-06-17 19:11:39 UTC  

https://youtu.be/07xd4DYywlo wow Heritage foundation showing some balls.

2019-06-17 19:44:52 UTC  

Hoax hate?

2019-06-17 19:47:30 UTC  

who knows, just glad he wasn't white

2019-06-17 19:48:29 UTC  

I always get suspicious when they bring up other incidents

2019-06-17 19:50:13 UTC  

Also he named himself magashooter

2019-06-17 20:15:32 UTC  

@MisterNovak ᴳ "Progressives have chosen an ideology of total warfare. They aren’t satisfied with compromise. They aren’t satisfied with surrender. They aren’t satisfied until they are roaming the conquered countryside shooting survivors." cant say I disagree

2019-06-17 20:17:49 UTC  

@scaevola yep, they were spot on with the analysis. Quite surprising tbh.

2019-06-17 20:18:03 UTC  

I'm inclined to believe that as well, but wouldn't progressives say the same about the "white supremacists"?

2019-06-17 20:19:07 UTC  

are you talking about white supremacists or "white supremacists" (people on the right)

2019-06-17 20:20:00 UTC  

I think radical groups will tend to lean towards violence and attempt to either make their opposition seem radical or else point to whatever radical opposition they may have

2019-06-17 20:21:41 UTC  

The option with scarequotes

2019-06-17 20:22:32 UTC  

And/or heavy airquotes

2019-06-17 20:23:40 UTC  

You always start with the position on the far end of your argument so you have room to negotiate... The difference is when you characterize all decenting views as evil

2019-06-17 20:24:04 UTC  

they would say that about people on the right, but people on the right dont want to radically change the culture in LA or New York if they dont live there. Progressives want to change the culture of every consevative State in the US and will only stop when every city and town agrees with their opinions on religion, free markets, sexual morality, immigration etc.

2019-06-17 20:24:24 UTC  

Both sides play that game though " they gonna put you back in chains" vs "they are going to start murdering babies"

2019-06-17 20:25:27 UTC  

Saying the right doesn't want to change LA or NY is not entirely true and to what degree it is true its relatively recent

2019-06-17 20:26:28 UTC  

Yeah I'd like LA to NOT BE a plague infested hell-hole

2019-06-17 20:26:52 UTC  

build the california wall

2019-06-17 20:26:56 UTC  

Don't forget the right was for prohibition, anti gay marriage, etc

2019-06-17 20:27:16 UTC  

Im saying most of the right would not lose sleep over these states doing what they want as long as they leave everyone else alone. They would want them to become conservative but I dont think you would see fake crimes to support a narrative and things like that

2019-06-17 20:28:01 UTC  

I dont think the religious right will back off of antiabortion just because it crosses state lines

2019-06-17 20:28:28 UTC  

They may be against roe vs wade, but i dont believe thats the end game

2019-06-17 20:28:38 UTC  

They will still see it as murder

2019-06-17 20:29:07 UTC  

I recommend watching the Prohibition PBS documentary, Putz, you'll find prohibition a product of progressiveness, a belief that infested both parties at the time

2019-06-17 20:29:13 UTC  

And do you think the metaphor of leftists roaming the countryside looking for wrongthinkers (shooting survivers) is wrong

2019-06-17 20:29:47 UTC  

not a lot of left wingers getting purged from companies