Message from @scaevola
Discord ID: 590025570088386591
Did you make that?
Some Australian was trying to explain it to us in voice chat
Ok.
it's not crisp. it's flakey and moist
We've got to start planning Matt's wedding!
you mean bachelor party!
You think we'll actually be invited?
someone needs to handcuff him to a street post in only his boxers
Maybe thats when the guy from the splc will attack
This is all gay...
No. He’s not going to bring the show to his wedding.
He probably wants to keep his family separated and protected from the internet
One private ceremony for the family.
One huge public one for the fans😃
@Shadows you can be the DJ.
Naa, you queers can have fun at his wedding.
just send me the time and location of the bachelorette party
putz demands his "right of the first night"
Guys I'm not a native english speaker can someone explain the "I WILL BE BOLD WITHOUT THE BULL" thing? I know what the words mean, but who is the bull?
Its a saying of being a Bull in a China shop, it is Bold, but will likely break things.
Or its saying that the person will be Bold without lying/Bull-shit. Its a retarded saying..... either way lol.
OK thanks! Still sounds terrible. I wonder if he came up with that himself.
@scaevola "bold without the bull"
in this context, "bull" is a sanitized way of saying the word "bullshit"
is a jab at Trump who is bold, but the left says he's full of bullshit
better than beto pushing to add transition surgery to medicaid
The more I hear him say that it sounds more and more like "bold without the bold" and I have to think for a bit to remember what he actually said
I thought he said bold without the bold too
@Agent Smith
I'm with Draco and Yuma, I could swear it was "bold w/out the bold" too...
*"¡Enunciation motherfucker, ¿do you speak it?!"*
What did he actually say, and does it even make any sense?
I heard "bold without the bol" which just doesn't make any sense to me anyway
But gauging by the audience's reaction (or lack thereof), I'm not alone in thinking that
https://youtu.be/07xd4DYywlo wow Heritage foundation showing some balls.
Hoax hate?
who knows, just glad he wasn't white
I always get suspicious when they bring up other incidents
Also he named himself magashooter
@MisterNovak ᴳ "Progressives have chosen an ideology of total warfare. They aren’t satisfied with compromise. They aren’t satisfied with surrender. They aren’t satisfied until they are roaming the conquered countryside shooting survivors." cant say I disagree
@scaevola yep, they were spot on with the analysis. Quite surprising tbh.
I'm inclined to believe that as well, but wouldn't progressives say the same about the "white supremacists"?