https://youtu.be/OnEkeQF46n8?t=1m30s

(also, iirc the 19 is the smaller frame, so you can't fit its mag into larger framed ones)

@Spanners, reactions like yours (but much worse) are why I *go out of my way* to say clip.
🤣🤣🤣🤣

clipazine

magaclip?

Clipamag?

Clag

?

clagazip

son just turned on tv

saved by the bell

kelly kapowski

Gross and brown.

@Spanners
Oh, and clipazine, too.

@Unironic Ohio Supremecist Just so you know, I'm gonna out spicy you with Super Chats today.

Lol. Cool story fam.

Oh its gonna happen.

I'm gonna get them to say the most outrageous things on air.

You do you.

Matt still thinks moderates who sit in the middle and refuse to do anything are going to somehow cause some effect

any RTS player knows a defensive player that refuses to attack, but only defend against attacks, will lose. every time. they keep chipping away at you, and all of your energy goes into repairs. you never diminish them, so they never stop growing. meanwhile, you become weaker with every attack

principled defensive moderacy is doomed

this is correct. proactive game plans work better than reactive

Y'all need to find Jesus; I agreed with @Unironic Ohio Supremecist...

The Jeremy Boering email to the Washington Post request made me spit out my eggs

*"Quote me on that."* 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@Deleted User I think the disconnect comes in that Matt is more or less happy with the status quo of, say, 5 years ago--and we haven't lost enough ground since then that he feels it as a boiling-frog emergency in the seat of his pants at all times.

I think he's wrong--the situation is more dire than he feels it is--but he isn't perceiving it as the existential threat that it is and so he is still treating it like a purely political game, where principles are important, rather than a total war, where winning is paramount.

Also I don't think he has a clear sense of what 'winning' would look like, which is a problem the Right shares generally, unless you're a literal Nazi in which case the end game is pretty clear, if distasteful.

>natsoc endgame >distasteful
Only one.

>wanting to be ruled by a drug addicted degenerate
>not distasteful

^

>I believe everything Jews tell me
t. (((Beemann)))

>believing in a leader who got cucked so hard the people he tried to yeet got their own state off of guilt he induced

Hitler confirmed for inside job #redpill #readmyblog

>getting fucked over by kikes makes you a cuck
Weird way to admit to being a cuck, fambulance.

>wanted thing so hard he yeeted the prior govt
>fucked up and the exact opposite of thing happened
>not cucked

Hitler being a fuck is a pretty small brain take

^

Not an argument
>hey isn't it kind of pathetic that someone could fuck up enough in their goals that their administration formed the basis for a plan that bolstered the very group he worked against?
>y-youre just stupid. He was great

Or is the argument here that the German is so inferior it couldn't have possibly worked? :^)