Message from @Nutz
Discord ID: 640552364687753275
@Make Jerusalem Christian Again unless your department puts a literal gun to your head there is no excuse to carry .40 unironically
@DJ_Anuz only if you never masturbated in lieu of before
@A. Spader disavow
Well @A. Spader, if you weren't so hasty to assume, you *might* have learned a trick from *Crazy Carry.* (¿Or is that just one of you?)
wat
😈😈😈😈
Holy shit, vc is lit up like a Christ's Mass tree...
Yes. I'm entertaining so I can't even Wade in
Ok... Back to *work.* Back in about 45-ish.
whose going to groypor wat at OSU?
@Mandatory Carry did pick up a 19 mag and some HP but not from there
do you know where can i find blond talking about blonds disease?
... Refresh my memory, ¿can a -19 clip fit an -17 or -18? (I'm pretty sure no...)
(also, iirc the 19 is the smaller frame, so you can't fit its mag into larger framed ones)
@Spanners, reactions like yours (but much worse) are why I *go out of my way* to say clip.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
clipazine
magaclip?
Clipamag?
Clag
clagazip
son just turned on tv
saved by the bell
kelly kapowski
Gross and brown.
@Spanners
Oh, and clipazine, too.
@Unironic Ohio Supremecist Just so you know, I'm gonna out spicy you with Super Chats today.
Lol. Cool story fam.
Oh its gonna happen.
I'm gonna get them to say the most outrageous things on air.
You do you.
Matt still thinks moderates who sit in the middle and refuse to do anything are going to somehow cause some effect
any RTS player knows a defensive player that refuses to attack, but only defend against attacks, will lose. every time. they keep chipping away at you, and all of your energy goes into repairs. you never diminish them, so they never stop growing. meanwhile, you become weaker with every attack
principled defensive moderacy is doomed
this is correct. proactive game plans work better than reactive
Y'all need to find Jesus; I agreed with @Unironic Ohio Supremecist...
The Jeremy Boering email to the Washington Post request made me spit out my eggs
*"Quote me on that."* 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Deleted User I think the disconnect comes in that Matt is more or less happy with the status quo of, say, 5 years ago--and we haven't lost enough ground since then that he feels it as a boiling-frog emergency in the seat of his pants at all times.
I think he's wrong--the situation is more dire than he feels it is--but he isn't perceiving it as the existential threat that it is and so he is still treating it like a purely political game, where principles are important, rather than a total war, where winning is paramount.
Also I don't think he has a clear sense of what 'winning' would look like, which is a problem the Right shares generally, unless you're a literal Nazi in which case the end game is pretty clear, if distasteful.
>natsoc endgame >distasteful
Only one.