You'd also have to buy a long arm, not just a pistol

btw

@CritterKiller
I'll send you the .docx...
That I refused to send to Leg for being a shithead.

So if liability insurance is intrinsically racist because minorities are poor, why is it *not* racist to allow a paid exemption from carry @Mandatory Carry ?

No, @Legalize.
@CritterKiller ***ASKED*** rather than ***TOLD ME*** what it said.
You didn't you just started lecturing ***AND*** insulting me from the start.

Mandatory Carry lecturing someone on lecturing and insulting. Precious.

that's the other problem I have. It's not one of law, it's that good people in the gun world like Mike Jones (youtube channel GarandThumb) ends every video with a plea for his audience to get training. That problem is gonna be multiplied 100x if this passed. The beauty of the current state of affairs is the people who self select wanting to carry have a built in incentive to learn, practice, and get good training. And even with that most people are woefully underprepared

Ok, @A. Spader, ¿do you have a suggestion, or are you just making assumptions like Legalize did?

Here it comes... "you're a liar" in 3... 2...

I am NOT in favor of stopping anyone based on what they can afford but the fact of the matter is that something as mundane as a negligent discharge can kill someone

When you have an idea or legitimate critism, tag me.

Negligent discharge is largely caused by lack of finger discipline, mental fortitude, or being a retard and Mexican Carrying off their belt.

See, ¿@uncephalized? *I* can keep my word.

Mexican Carrying. Sounds oddly suspicious like someone we know.

the point I am making is that gun culture is largely existing within the counterculture right now, and if you force everyone (most people) to carry, there is going to be not only serious pushback but lowest common denominator mentality

So if liability insurance is intrinsically racist because minorities are poor, why is it *not* racist to allow a paid exemption from carry @Mandatory Carry ?

Eliminate the lowest common denominator.

I assume I'm unblocked now

cowardly liar

But yes, people are largely hesitant, ignorant, or don't care.

legally preventing someone from stuffing a hipoint down their pants to comply is not the same thing as being concerned that someone would do it

Unfortunately.

My roommate who is military but grunt status has been known to do that shit on his back.

Which I give him fair criticism every single day.

my classmates are watching netflix during class and then wondering why they f--- up on the exam. I do not want them to spend 10 minutes online finding the cheapest metal machine containing tiny explosions and then waltzing around near me

again, that is NOT to say they should be legally barred from doing so

but when crafting legislation it is our responsibility to consider unintended consequences

@Legalize
Because I already did.

I think if this was amended in scope and purpose it has alot better chance of both suceeding in intended purpose and public support

Those are the type of people who either will hit a roadblock, beat adversity and succeed or stay retarded working the minimum for the rest of their pathetic lives.

@A. Spader
*"but when crafting legislation it is our responsibility to consider unintended consequences"*
Aye... That's why I ***LIKE*** legitimate critism.

mold this into something more like the original Militia Acts, and I think you get the best of both worlds

@Legalize
If I answer you, ¿you gonna accept the consequences of said answer? 🤬🤬🤬🤬

All I want is for the Government to stop overreaching their boundaries, and enforcing law after law that infringes upon our 2a rights.

@Legalize

Tttttaday son

you lose the legal liability minefields you can bet the courts will throw you towards, while maintaining the purpose of an armed society forever freed from the threat of gun bans

TITLE V.
PENALTIES
Section 14 Any person who willfully ignores any part of this act may be, upon first violation, fined not more than $1ØØ; Upon second and subsequent violations, $5ØØ. Upon fourth and subsequent violations, incarcerated not more than 2 years. This includes failure to carry as required, carrying as prohibited, and use of terminology contrary to this act.

You just proved yourself a liar, son.

Well then your a Part C.
Look. It. Up.

(he's calling you mentally incomptetent @Legalize)

Now, ¿any non 4F's got a thought?