Making the case that Iran was going to nuke them first gets pretty easy when you look at all the rhetoric from Iran about wiping Israel off the map.

This may just be me

but when I was going through basic, one of the first things you get told is

if the guy looking to kill you repetitively says he's gonna kill you, it's better if you believe him

the best middle east foreign policy is to say "do whatever the fuck you want to each other, we don't care, unless you screw with us in which case we will wipe you off the face of the earth"

but alas that hasn't been true of us foreign policy since the 1800s

She would probably get overruled less than Bolton did. Time for Trump to live up to his anti war retoric

@A. Spader I generally agree

but sadly I don't think that doctrine can be kept to even in the best of times

There are some things, imo, which are decidedly in our (ie the West's) interests which justify at least staying there

I'm not sure I agree

Pretty much anything we "need" to do in the middle east Israel will do for us if we leave

Israel is what I meant by "staying there" lol

why I used 'the West' as a whole : P

Oh

Then yeah I'm with ya

for me, if the rest of western civ would stop being such pussies about the issue Israel would have a freer hand in dealing with shit

This works out for the muh j00s guys as well

Why spend our blood and treasure when the Jews can use theirs?

The only thing you need to do, really, is allow them to go wild and hold back "international" (ie, Muslim) condemnation

I'm hoping the move to nuclear would progress quicker

would make oil a redundant resource

For a moment there I thought you meant that you hoped the move to nuke Iran would go quicker

lmao

Well, one can definitely read it as that, and I wouldn't disagree, tbh : P

I had the "geez!" sounder and everything

I'd prefer if the nuke came from Eretz Yisrael and not the United States

@Fondboy
*"The USA can keep Iran harmless (with nukes at least)..."*
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm not sure which is funnier, that you said it or that you meant it...

@Salacious Swanky Cat
Well, you won't mind in the least that Barrack gave Iran the bomb.

lol I framed that badly xD

I meant they can keep them harmless by making sure they don't have nukes

...
They.
Have.
Nukes.

Bobby Francis doesn’t need nukes, he’ll just break into your house and steal stuff

We were talking about Iran.
It was SWALLWELL who said he needed nukes...

Uh I know.

_"Turn in your gun, I got nukes..."_
🤣🤣 What s faggot...

So, is it just me, or are Kevlar back packs or Kevlar hoodies a REALLY bad idea.

Without having ceramic or metal plates to disperse the impact I would much rather a bullet penetrate my body than have 100% of it's energy ignite a bomb in my internal organs.

Ask a cop who's been shot. I'd wager they know a little about bullet resistant vests...

DJ, ¿do you not know how Kevlar works?

And here's Legalize, the *"scientist"* of pens, to explain Kevlar to you, @DJ_Anuz.
Go on, Leag, you know all about it. And psychology. And history, firearms, warfare, economics, on and on... With your degree in pens...

PORTABLE COMMUNICATIONS TRANSCRIPTION DEVICES

@Mandatory Carry Kevlar in and of itself isn't a bullet proof vest.

What I'm saying is a Kevlar backpack (as most these so called "bullet proof backpacks" are made of) doesn't have the ceramic or metal plates to disperse the bullets energy.

Having straight Kevlar (assuming it can stop the bullet) would transfer all the bullets energy right into your body. It would be like a mini grenade going off inside of you.