I'm hoping the move to nuclear would progress quicker

would make oil a redundant resource

For a moment there I thought you meant that you hoped the move to nuke Iran would go quicker

lmao

Well, one can definitely read it as that, and I wouldn't disagree, tbh : P

I had the "geez!" sounder and everything

I'd prefer if the nuke came from Eretz Yisrael and not the United States

@Fondboy
*"The USA can keep Iran harmless (with nukes at least)..."*
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm not sure which is funnier, that you said it or that you meant it...

@Salacious Swanky Cat
Well, you won't mind in the least that Barrack gave Iran the bomb.

lol I framed that badly xD

I meant they can keep them harmless by making sure they don't have nukes

...
They.
Have.
Nukes.

Bobby Francis doesn’t need nukes, he’ll just break into your house and steal stuff

We were talking about Iran.
It was SWALLWELL who said he needed nukes...

Uh I know.

_"Turn in your gun, I got nukes..."_
🤣🤣 What s faggot...

So, is it just me, or are Kevlar back packs or Kevlar hoodies a REALLY bad idea.

Without having ceramic or metal plates to disperse the impact I would much rather a bullet penetrate my body than have 100% of it's energy ignite a bomb in my internal organs.

Ask a cop who's been shot. I'd wager they know a little about bullet resistant vests...

DJ, ¿do you not know how Kevlar works?

And here's Legalize, the *"scientist"* of pens, to explain Kevlar to you, @DJ_Anuz.
Go on, Leag, you know all about it. And psychology. And history, firearms, warfare, economics, on and on... With your degree in pens...

PORTABLE COMMUNICATIONS TRANSCRIPTION DEVICES

@Mandatory Carry Kevlar in and of itself isn't a bullet proof vest.

What I'm saying is a Kevlar backpack (as most these so called "bullet proof backpacks" are made of) doesn't have the ceramic or metal plates to disperse the bullets energy.

Having straight Kevlar (assuming it can stop the bullet) would transfer all the bullets energy right into your body. It would be like a mini grenade going off inside of you.

Kevlar is just soft body armor and will only stop handgun rounds. Rifle bullets will still go straight through it. Stopping a handgun round will bruise you pretty badly, but what you're describing sounds like some serious fuddlore

At best it's a Level IIIA, but better than nothing

Kevlar would only stop small arms fire, but what I'm saying is that even small arms fire would probably do more damage to your body unless you had some means to disperse the bullets energy than the damage a bullet would cause tearing through the body.

No, @DJ_Anuz, Kevlar vedts)/packs/etc. act like a net to "catch" the projectile and dispurse it over a wider area, and while I admit to skeptism about how *"resistant"* a backpack is (¿2Ø layers at 5 lbs? ¿who do they think they're kidding?), it doesn't transfer to the body.
... In theory.

...
I fucking hate theories btw.

I tuned in just in time for FondBoy!

@DJ_Anuz a 9mm bullet carries similar energy to a trained punch from a strong person. So the damage it can do to you is bruises or internal injuries from the impact.

B-but what if the shooter uses .50 BMG?

what if they use a gau-8?

>Zoomers resort to grandfathered weaponry for their sprees once the AR15s have been yeeted under threat of nuke
>media learns what .308 and .50 do to structures and living beings

.45 acp or .5 ae ?

Hard choice

I would not disarm under threat of nukes.

I would dare them

I dont think Zoomers are able to arm themselves circa 1940 standards on a regular basis either

But when Matt "Give me 2a or it's bombs away" Christiansen is forced to crusade, maybe they'll figure it out

lmao

idk, I just really like the 45

Call it a personal bias but the m1911 is still my favorite pistol

I have a shitposting video for you when I get back on WiFi