If the same people are raised in another culture they have this problematic way of not turning out to be a terrible person.

So its important we, as racists, push to homogenize all culture as Urban to maximize the decline of the culture.

Really drive it into the ground you know?

Gotta deconstruct ASAP

what its all about

Until you see a thug steal an old ladies mobility scooter while they're both on their way back from a crack house, and drive away on it while she's hobbling after him and screeching...

You haven't lived.

Are you European?

As in, do you have mostly European ancestry?

@Old Man Hound that's okay mate, because the old lady just goes into the mobility scooter store and buys another one on the government dime (at least that's how it _supposedly_ works down here)

See, nothing the welfare state can't solve with more of your money!

*“The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”*
-Margaret THATCHER (and confirmed by snopes, 😲)

So I have an idea to propose, and I would like to hear people opinions on it to see if it holds water.

The fact that modern day Americans live in the most comfortable and luxurious point in history is objective according to the past, and subjective according to the future.

...
I can certainly support that it's objective according to the past (even CA can get the lights on *sometimes*), but to accept that it's subjective according to the future is contingent upon information not in evidence. You might be correct, but we can only prove this by looking backwards- At which point we're at that point in history.

That notion seems to assume that things will continue to only get better in the future, which we can't know can't know if it will, and there seems to be reason to suggest that it won't.

The thought that anything can continue in perpetuity buckles under reality.

That’s the “end of history” mindset proposed and pushed by Francis Fukuyama.

Long live *SOCIETY*

Which we live in.

🤣🤘

I understand that the future is not fact. That's why I would say it is subjective to the future. The future may prove to be more comfortable or we can be set back. The statement I made is subject upon how the future pans out.

Why is mandy called @Mandatory Carry now? Did you do this to yourself? 🤷

...
Back in 2Ø14, Shannon WATTS sent an internal email saying *"we have to stop these "mandatory carry faggots." Remember these facts:"* and have a bulleted list, I remember the first one was *'eomen are 12 times more likely to be killed by dv in a home with guns.'*
Three days of pissy ranting later, I got drunk and thought it was funny...
¿Any more pointless stupid questions?

And to this day you're the only one who thinks its funnu

Lol

@Mandatory Carry I always assumed it was because you're a colossal faggot...

And that's why I like you, @Unironic Ohio Supremecist...
You're an honest idiot.

I mean... better than being a faggot.

Or a paranoid tweaker

^

Kevin you've gotta step your game up. Mandy hasn't blocked you once, and I'm on my 3rd block

Kek. Nice.

I really wish he would.

Wait, would I still have to see his inane @ing me every 5 minutes?

Yes

He can still see your messages, but he has to click on them to view them.

You'll know when you cant react to his messages.

Lol. Why would I ever do that?

He strikes me as the type of person who thinks no one understands him because he has a 160 IQ.

But in reality no one understands him because he's a raving lunatic with an 80 IQ.