Thats amateur stuff.

I mean, lets be honest, if a person grows up in the projects, sees 30% of his friends fall to drugs or gangs, never knows their father, can't get past 5th grade, and still votes for the SAME PEOPLE IN CHARGE

I dont know what else I could possibly do more effective.

You could ask me why I would support the welfare state, even support expanding it to help people get out of hole they're stuck in, and finally get that little support that they've been missing all this time?

Which is different support then the other million kinds of support?

Racism. Pure Racism. Its the best racist plan a person could possibly design, and I mean that 100%.

** This is kind of a joke. I don't support Welfare, but if I did, this would be my argument. **

Round, I been saying welfare leads to neo-slavery for... Eh, about 5 years I guess.
Litterally no one will listen, but if an avowed racist says it, *maybe then they will.*

i am about to say something really racist

orange man bad

😲

I thought it was racist to NOT say Orange Man Bad...
¿I'm racist now? Good, idgafff.

Well if you go around looking at how things actually turn out you might get crazy ideas like that. But think of how good it feels to tell the government to take other people's money and give it to the poor black peepo

Oh it feels great.

Its the best part of the racism pie.

EVeryone feels good and no one can figure out why everyone is raping, murdering, and literally the worst people by any possible measurement in the inner city.

The only problem is.

...

If the same people are raised in another culture they have this problematic way of not turning out to be a terrible person.

So its important we, as racists, push to homogenize all culture as Urban to maximize the decline of the culture.

Really drive it into the ground you know?

Gotta deconstruct ASAP

what its all about

Until you see a thug steal an old ladies mobility scooter while they're both on their way back from a crack house, and drive away on it while she's hobbling after him and screeching...

You haven't lived.

Are you European?

As in, do you have mostly European ancestry?

@Old Man Hound that's okay mate, because the old lady just goes into the mobility scooter store and buys another one on the government dime (at least that's how it _supposedly_ works down here)

See, nothing the welfare state can't solve with more of your money!

*“The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”*
-Margaret THATCHER (and confirmed by snopes, 😲)

So I have an idea to propose, and I would like to hear people opinions on it to see if it holds water.

The fact that modern day Americans live in the most comfortable and luxurious point in history is objective according to the past, and subjective according to the future.

...
I can certainly support that it's objective according to the past (even CA can get the lights on *sometimes*), but to accept that it's subjective according to the future is contingent upon information not in evidence. You might be correct, but we can only prove this by looking backwards- At which point we're at that point in history.

That notion seems to assume that things will continue to only get better in the future, which we can't know can't know if it will, and there seems to be reason to suggest that it won't.

The thought that anything can continue in perpetuity buckles under reality.

That’s the “end of history” mindset proposed and pushed by Francis Fukuyama.

Long live *SOCIETY*

Which we live in.

🤣🤘

I understand that the future is not fact. That's why I would say it is subjective to the future. The future may prove to be more comfortable or we can be set back. The statement I made is subject upon how the future pans out.

Why is mandy called @Mandatory Carry now? Did you do this to yourself? 🤷