Message from @Unironic Ohio Supremecist
Discord ID: 640693682017927172
The fact that modern day Americans live in the most comfortable and luxurious point in history is objective according to the past, and subjective according to the future.
...
I can certainly support that it's objective according to the past (even CA can get the lights on *sometimes*), but to accept that it's subjective according to the future is contingent upon information not in evidence. You might be correct, but we can only prove this by looking backwards- At which point we're at that point in history.
That notion seems to assume that things will continue to only get better in the future, which we can't know can't know if it will, and there seems to be reason to suggest that it won't.
The thought that anything can continue in perpetuity buckles under reality.
That’s the “end of history” mindset proposed and pushed by Francis Fukuyama.
Long live *SOCIETY*
Which we live in.
🤣🤘
I understand that the future is not fact. That's why I would say it is subjective to the future. The future may prove to be more comfortable or we can be set back. The statement I made is subject upon how the future pans out.
Why is mandy called @Mandatory Carry now? Did you do this to yourself? 🤷
...
Back in 2Ø14, Shannon WATTS sent an internal email saying *"we have to stop these "mandatory carry faggots." Remember these facts:"* and have a bulleted list, I remember the first one was *'eomen are 12 times more likely to be killed by dv in a home with guns.'*
Three days of pissy ranting later, I got drunk and thought it was funny...
¿Any more pointless stupid questions?
And to this day you're the only one who thinks its funnu
Lol
@Mandatory Carry I always assumed it was because you're a colossal faggot...
And that's why I like you, @Unironic Ohio Supremecist...
You're an honest idiot.
I mean... better than being a faggot.
Or a paranoid tweaker
^
Kevin you've gotta step your game up. Mandy hasn't blocked you once, and I'm on my 3rd block
Kek. Nice.
Wait, would I still have to see his inane @ing me every 5 minutes?
Yes
He can still see your messages, but he has to click on them to view them.
You'll know when you cant react to his messages.
Lol. Why would I ever do that?
He strikes me as the type of person who thinks no one understands him because he has a 160 IQ.
But in reality no one understands him because he's a raving lunatic with an 80 IQ.
^
anyone who either doesnt understand him or disagrees is a liar.
easy to defeat your intellectual enemies when you label them all as liars and dismiss them
i still want to know if he knocked up his sister-in-law or not
^This.
did you see his post about that?
Wat
He did what exactly?
we dont know exactly
He said his daughter is addicted to meth.
Because his sister-in-law smoked while pregnant.
Because he's an 80 IQ lunatic.
yea lol