Message from @davidfire1332
Discord ID: 644320351840501770
Oh no... I think Fond wants this battle.
And I know he'll prevail, too.
I bear a healthy skepticism on whether this issue will be resolved
I'm streaming and Recording
I'm also gonna rip the audio later if anyone wants it
¿General or debate?
chek <#266407776178143233> for all the debate match details
Will there be a Q&A session post-debate?
yes
Should the subsequent duel be with swords or pistols?
in the collesum
and the voice is not synced with the stream
it's gamer time 😎
woof
D:
Thomas Aquinas give us strength
and I'm pretty certain I know how this debate is gonna go even before the finishing of Pius' summary
@Spartan322 pray tell
Fuck there's a lot of us listening lol
the majority of the subject is beyond scope and its gonna lead on the subject
19 people in all
God is a theory
*surprised Pikachu*
its also (currently) entirely based on specific interpretations of a variable theory
which isn't definitively known or defined
God was / is a tool that was used to control vast groups of people. Do this, don't do that or god will smite you. You don't wanna be dust do you, fall in line
broke take
idk why I'm listening to two people who don't know what they're talking about debating with each other
I'm a little dejected, I was hoping this would be more specific and definitive
yeah later folks have a nice rest of your evening :)
I still am willing to try and propose a ponder on the subject later on or post-debate/post-QA, but anything I'll end up saying would probably break the discussion
Tbh metaphysics was probably a bad jumping point for a first debate. It honestly works better as a discussion anyway
partly, but the bigger issue is broken theologic foundation
you can't argue this unless you have a definite form for the subject which just to point out is by definition of omnipetence impossible
Metaphysics always meanders on
thus humanistic reason can not achieve a definitive nor reasonable explaination regarding some god or the God
Just get proof god exists, all these other arguments are meaningless
man would not believe no matter the proof
if A then B then C