Message from @Catboi

Discord ID: 674418702208466954


2020-02-05 00:44:47 UTC  

with republicans like these who needs democrats?

2020-02-05 00:44:51 UTC  

"but it says non-legally binding, even though it is also saying law enforcement will use these standards!"

2020-02-05 00:45:18 UTC  

@Salacious Swanky Cat do you know how often judges have been removed for rulings like that?

2020-02-05 00:45:20 UTC  

"can't you see the non-legally binding definition will be used, but it's not legally binding, can't you read!?"

2020-02-05 00:45:32 UTC  

@A. Spader Not enough probably

2020-02-05 00:45:37 UTC  

at the state supreme court/federal level

2020-02-05 00:45:39 UTC  

twice

2020-02-05 00:45:40 UTC  

ever

2020-02-05 00:45:44 UTC  

@A. Spader obviously neither of these guys know how rare it is for things to get overturned

2020-02-05 00:45:52 UTC  

or for judges to be recalled / impeached

2020-02-05 00:45:57 UTC  

once during the founding era, and once a few years ago in Iowa

2020-02-05 00:46:15 UTC  

literally the only time judges have been impeached for rulings

2020-02-05 00:46:34 UTC  

>It'll get appealed, don't worry about the hatespeech law!

2020-02-05 00:47:20 UTC  

aight folks I'll be back in a few hours

2020-02-05 00:49:33 UTC  

>ur deluded for worrying, it doesn't change anything!

2020-02-05 00:49:43 UTC  

"The order will direct the Justice Department and the Education Department to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition and its adjoining examples – which state that efforts to demonize, delegitimize or apply double standards to Israel are antisemitic – in discrimination cases brought forth under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act."

2020-02-05 00:51:01 UTC  

"Ted Deutch of Florida, now wants the bill broadened beyond its narrow focus on the Education Department – which began applying the IHRA definition in civil rights cases last year – in favor of a “whole of government” approach that directs all federal agencies to adopt the framework."

2020-02-05 00:51:18 UTC  

>Ur deluded catboi

2020-02-05 00:51:21 UTC  

>it's just optics

2020-02-05 00:55:43 UTC  

Well, if that law ever gets challenged, then it will unlikely survive court.

2020-02-05 00:59:08 UTC  

Like the bump stock law?

2020-02-05 00:59:10 UTC  

oh wait

2020-02-05 00:59:29 UTC  

Don't worry, it'll be challenged for years in court

2020-02-05 00:59:41 UTC  

if it ever is even allowed to be appealed

2020-02-05 00:59:42 UTC  

Ok.

2020-02-05 01:00:18 UTC  

Supreme court already refused to hear anything about hte bump stock executive order

2020-02-05 01:00:29 UTC  

***w e i r d***

2020-02-05 01:00:46 UTC  

They refuse to hear tons of stuff

2020-02-05 01:00:54 UTC  

You're confused

2020-02-05 01:00:59 UTC  

they didn't just decline to hear a case

2020-02-05 01:01:02 UTC  

nothing has been filed

2020-02-05 01:01:05 UTC  

it doesn't work that way, it takes years after something has been filed to even make it to the court

2020-02-05 01:01:12 UTC  

they said, they will not hear it at all

2020-02-05 01:01:30 UTC  

Not the same as the 1% acceptance rate of cases....

2020-02-05 01:01:51 UTC  

That law can eventually get overturned.

2020-02-05 01:02:08 UTC  

yeah, by the next executive order

2020-02-05 01:02:21 UTC  

👍🏻

2020-02-05 01:02:29 UTC  

Possibly.

2020-02-05 01:08:35 UTC  

If this is the kind of behavior we can expect from Trump

2020-02-05 01:08:45 UTC  

we're in for a wild ride for te next Democrat

2020-02-05 01:09:52 UTC  

no crap. the US has a cultural sickness