But don't worry goy

James Fields was the dude's name unless I'm mistaken

the judge or defense lawyer?

judge

the constitution will protect us

Judge decides what's admissable

fuck that case was a blackpill

even if the attorneys argue about it

Ok so that judge is bad.

hahaha

He should be removed.

gOoD jUdGeS

Okay well, when some kids gets kicked out of college for saying the jews did 9/11

or loses his federal loan

we can come back here and I can say

"told you it was a hate speech law retards"

with republicans like these who needs democrats?

"but it says non-legally binding, even though it is also saying law enforcement will use these standards!"

@Salacious Swanky Cat do you know how often judges have been removed for rulings like that?

"can't you see the non-legally binding definition will be used, but it's not legally binding, can't you read!?"

@A. Spader Not enough probably

at the state supreme court/federal level

twice

ever

@A. Spader obviously neither of these guys know how rare it is for things to get overturned

or for judges to be recalled / impeached

once during the founding era, and once a few years ago in Iowa

literally the only time judges have been impeached for rulings

>It'll get appealed, don't worry about the hatespeech law!

aight folks I'll be back in a few hours

>ur deluded for worrying, it doesn't change anything!

"The order will direct the Justice Department and the Education Department to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition and its adjoining examples – which state that efforts to demonize, delegitimize or apply double standards to Israel are antisemitic – in discrimination cases brought forth under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act."

"Ted Deutch of Florida, now wants the bill broadened beyond its narrow focus on the Education Department – which began applying the IHRA definition in civil rights cases last year – in favor of a “whole of government” approach that directs all federal agencies to adopt the framework."

>Ur deluded catboi

>it's just optics

Well, if that law ever gets challenged, then it will unlikely survive court.

Like the bump stock law?

oh wait

Don't worry, it'll be challenged for years in court

if it ever is even allowed to be appealed

Ok.