Message from @A. Spader
Discord ID: 674415312443146271
judge
the constitution will protect us
Judge decides what's admissable
fuck that case was a blackpill
even if the attorneys argue about it
Ok so that judge is bad.
hahaha
He should be removed.
gOoD jUdGeS
Okay well, when some kids gets kicked out of college for saying the jews did 9/11
or loses his federal loan
we can come back here and I can say
"told you it was a hate speech law retards"
with republicans like these who needs democrats?
"but it says non-legally binding, even though it is also saying law enforcement will use these standards!"
@Salacious Swanky Cat do you know how often judges have been removed for rulings like that?
"can't you see the non-legally binding definition will be used, but it's not legally binding, can't you read!?"
@A. Spader Not enough probably
at the state supreme court/federal level
twice
@A. Spader obviously neither of these guys know how rare it is for things to get overturned
or for judges to be recalled / impeached
once during the founding era, and once a few years ago in Iowa
literally the only time judges have been impeached for rulings
>It'll get appealed, don't worry about the hatespeech law!
aight folks I'll be back in a few hours
>ur deluded for worrying, it doesn't change anything!
"The order will direct the Justice Department and the Education Department to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition and its adjoining examples – which state that efforts to demonize, delegitimize or apply double standards to Israel are antisemitic – in discrimination cases brought forth under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act."
"Ted Deutch of Florida, now wants the bill broadened beyond its narrow focus on the Education Department – which began applying the IHRA definition in civil rights cases last year – in favor of a “whole of government” approach that directs all federal agencies to adopt the framework."
>Ur deluded catboi
>it's just optics
Well, if that law ever gets challenged, then it will unlikely survive court.
Like the bump stock law?
oh wait
Don't worry, it'll be challenged for years in court
if it ever is even allowed to be appealed
Ok.
Supreme court already refused to hear anything about hte bump stock executive order
***w e i r d***
They refuse to hear tons of stuff