>Ur deluded catboi

>it's just optics

Well, if that law ever gets challenged, then it will unlikely survive court.

Like the bump stock law?

oh wait

Don't worry, it'll be challenged for years in court

if it ever is even allowed to be appealed

Ok.

Supreme court already refused to hear anything about hte bump stock executive order

***w e i r d***

They refuse to hear tons of stuff

You're confused

they didn't just decline to hear a case

nothing has been filed

it doesn't work that way, it takes years after something has been filed to even make it to the court

they said, they will not hear it at all

Not the same as the 1% acceptance rate of cases....

That law can eventually get overturned.

yeah, by the next executive order

👍🏻

Possibly.

If this is the kind of behavior we can expect from Trump

we're in for a wild ride for te next Democrat

no crap. the US has a cultural sickness

>(((cultural sickness)))

really?

it's always the jews with you people

>(((you people)))

you're the one that said it, not me

don't get mad at me goy

that's what ((())) means

I don't get an EO to protect my interests

I really don't get how peolpe hand wave this away

as if it's from a "non legally binding defintion"

which essentially means subject to change

it's the same language they use to put people in Jail/Prison in Europe

it's the exact same language translated ...

Germany uses this standard to prosecute holocaust denial, and "antisemitism"

I doubt it will stand for long

Especially if someone sues over it

The fact that it was made in the first place should also be worrisome