Message from @Nic Harvard

Discord ID: 533091346387566593


2019-01-11 01:06:53 UTC  

True reone

2019-01-11 01:07:06 UTC  

It’s not something I’m against but taking down the welfare state is again, a good first step

2019-01-11 01:07:18 UTC  

I’m all for helping each other out but that’s not what I meant when I said abolish welfare

2019-01-11 01:07:23 UTC  

^

2019-01-11 01:07:29 UTC  

Welfare is a shorthand for the welfare state in America

2019-01-11 01:07:59 UTC  

He knows.

2019-01-11 01:09:14 UTC  

Yeah, don’t think we have anything to disagree on. Welfare is good. I loved my granny when she was dying for two years with cancer and couldn’t get out of bed.

2019-01-11 01:09:35 UTC  

Problem is the word itself has been corrupted

2019-01-11 01:09:44 UTC  

Look at how “general welfare” is seen now

2019-01-11 01:10:06 UTC  

Making me pay for some other fuck to look after her would have been wrong on so many different levels

2019-01-11 01:10:27 UTC  

The focus seems to have gone from the phrase itself and onto just welfare

2019-01-11 01:10:40 UTC  

And nah, see, that’s one of the things I don’t like about Shapiro as well

2019-01-11 01:11:11 UTC  

You mean like siphoning off 95% for other things?

2019-01-11 01:11:30 UTC  

His talk of moving to find jobs because free market doesn’t really stick when he himself admits living close to his parents and in-laws provide substantial benefit that can’t be measured on a simple cost/benefit scale

2019-01-11 01:12:03 UTC  

Rather substantial blind spot

2019-01-11 01:12:27 UTC  

Wrong level of economic analysis he has, pontificate he should avoid...

2019-01-11 01:12:55 UTC  

And considering a lot of people do the opposite, ie, move and then bring their relatives with them, it definitely provides a level of support and some other benefit that simply cannot be seen through an economic lens

2019-01-11 01:13:23 UTC  

His insistence on “move because there are jobs and you would perform economically better” is missing the forest for the trees

2019-01-11 01:14:02 UTC  

It can. Just adjust the focus on your scope. And see all the bits. He’s not an engineer nor scientist

2019-01-11 01:14:24 UTC  

You reckon?

2019-01-11 01:14:41 UTC  

Yup, been there, done that;)

2019-01-11 01:14:46 UTC  

Cause I think the benefits are something that only be measured on a communal or an emotional sense here

2019-01-11 01:14:51 UTC  

Not economical

2019-01-11 01:15:01 UTC  

That can*

2019-01-11 01:15:36 UTC  

It can. Which is why things like delivery works as a business

2019-01-11 01:15:45 UTC  

And I guess if you were to put a dollar value on someone going to a shrink or something to make up for their familial disconnect you can

2019-01-11 01:16:04 UTC  

I just don’t see it as the most effective way of measuring the effects

2019-01-11 01:16:43 UTC  

No, seriously, I’m almost strawmanning myself

2019-01-11 01:17:32 UTC  

Tear this apart and tell me why having my food delivered or an au pair is not long term good 👹🤯

2019-01-11 01:19:09 UTC  

I mean, if I can put an economic value on not preparing supper, or looking after my kids, or taxing it when I can?

2019-01-11 01:19:10 UTC  

> good parenting is white supremacy

2019-01-11 01:19:19 UTC  

Fuck me

2019-01-11 01:19:21 UTC  

Lol. Fool

2019-01-11 01:20:25 UTC  

You should be able to rip me a new orrifice better than that!!?

2019-01-11 01:20:35 UTC  

Nah, I see where you’re coming from, but as I said, I just don’t think it’s the most effective way of measuring it... which is kinda strange since the other ways can’t really be measured

2019-01-11 01:20:48 UTC  

Ah well fair enough I guess

2019-01-11 01:21:07 UTC  

Absolutely right though, I wouldn’t have been able to raise my daughter if my parents weren’t around to help

2019-01-11 01:21:11 UTC  

Not can’t. Just damn difficult and seldom done

2019-01-11 01:21:26 UTC  

That’s almost invaluable

2019-01-11 01:21:35 UTC  

Mmm, agreed

2019-01-11 01:22:02 UTC  

You mean.. “for everything else there is MasterCard?”