Message from @Beemann

Discord ID: 533489033377087519


2019-01-12 03:25:20 UTC  

Even Naruto leans on this, they just fail in it wrt their OC. It's illusory

2019-01-12 03:26:36 UTC  

Not really. GTO is one large conflict (Onizuka wants to become the greatest teacher) and many smaller conflicts (students' personal problems, attempts at sabotage) that tie into the larger one

2019-01-12 03:27:05 UTC  

Naruto has other characters with their own (often potentially better) conflicts. Superman has personal and political conflicts

2019-01-12 03:27:09 UTC  

That's all well and good and works for that story, sure. But we're talking about general "rules" of writing.

2019-01-12 03:27:32 UTC  

Yes, one singular conflict is generally not going to carry you through more than a single short story

2019-01-12 03:27:47 UTC  

Which is fine considering we're talking about stories in general

2019-01-12 03:27:49 UTC  

For a series or novel you need to think bigger than that

2019-01-12 03:28:10 UTC  

Sure, but we're more specifically talking about stories in relation to Naruto (and whatever other animu)

2019-01-12 03:28:17 UTC  

The train of thought you're following is getting too granular

2019-01-12 03:30:33 UTC  

When following a philosophy of things like writing, I find that applying a U.S. government structure of understanding works best. You start broad (constitution) then you break it down to specifics for what you're working on (states) then even more specific for your topic (municipality) and then even more specific (individual). At the moment, no one's even agreeing on the broad

2019-01-12 03:32:44 UTC  

Its because we all hate monopoly!

2019-01-12 03:32:57 UTC  

Oh you meant a different broad

2019-01-12 03:33:03 UTC  

broad and board

2019-01-12 03:33:08 UTC  

Monopoly was designed to be hated

2019-01-12 03:33:21 UTC  

I like Monopoly tho lol

2019-01-12 03:33:37 UTC  

Ever play that revised one where you use a credit card instead of money?

2019-01-12 03:33:45 UTC  

It's anticapitalist propaganda that hilariously got appropriated and commoditized

2019-01-12 03:33:56 UTC  

I have not

2019-01-12 03:34:17 UTC  

@SteelandSouls That credit card one (they made a few), was crap, it made the game take so much longer...

2019-01-12 03:34:42 UTC  

Right?! It wasn't as convenient as they made it seem

2019-01-12 03:34:57 UTC  

I see a lot of potential in debt-based monopoly

2019-01-12 03:35:00 UTC  

Tbh

2019-01-12 03:35:11 UTC  

Maybe not as it was implemented but still

2019-01-12 14:58:57 UTC  

any board game where you can lose halfway through the game is a shitty board game

2019-01-12 14:59:11 UTC  

like you're just supposed to sit there with your thumb up your ass while the rest of your friends have fun

2019-01-12 14:59:19 UTC  

Yep

2019-01-12 14:59:31 UTC  

Anyone who likes Monopoly hasn't played any good board games

2019-01-12 15:01:07 UTC  

and there are 18 bajillion versions of monopoly since all you have to do is change the property names/community chest text and boom, different game

2019-01-12 15:01:29 UTC  

Star Wars Monopoly

2019-01-12 15:01:42 UTC  

Grey's Anatomy Monopoly

2019-01-12 15:01:49 UTC  

Debbie Does Dallas Monopoly

2019-01-12 15:04:23 UTC  

@Beemann Puerto Rico is a great boardgame that is like advanced Monopoly

2019-01-12 15:06:53 UTC  

It's like capitalism on cocaine

2019-01-12 15:38:00 UTC  

My favourite board game of all time was illuminati by Steve Jackson games

2019-01-12 15:43:10 UTC  

@Nic Harvard I'll check it out. I think settlers was overrated but ticket to ride was a blast

2019-01-12 17:09:04 UTC  

Both were cool, but I’d not spend money on buying a set

2019-01-12 17:55:13 UTC  

Holy fuck some new person joining the run for. What’s interesting. Is fox showed the full announcement live CNN MSNBC didn’t let you hear him and ran commentary over

2019-01-12 17:58:00 UTC  

What?

2019-01-12 17:58:05 UTC  

I would like to run a survey with a fictional character, who has trump policies, but a different name, with three answers:
1) Vote for this person; 2) DJT; 3) None of the above, someone else