How you prevent it?

Lying is never moral. It may sometimes be EXCUSABLE or UNDERSTANDABLE, but never moral.

The purpose of moral philosophy or theology is to give us standard operating procedures for when shit hits the fan.

90% of my time in the military and 99.9% of my tens of thousands of (well spent) martial arts training were about that.

Seeing as the former prevented any of my own troops from dieing and the latter has saved my life on at least five occasions, I consider this preparation well spent

YMMV of course. Many people have a high-k approach to life

@DroneHost the premise was the the government knows but lies about it. If they are not aware of it it does not matter if you see it before it enters the athmosphere

The premise was also about it not being possible to do anything about it, not like some action movie where we find the one guy with and idea to save us all. But i also said, i was just tossing out a fast crazy premise, if i took time i could make it far more concrete. @I AM ERROR

You never know that it is not possible to do anything about it if you don‘t ask everyone if they have an idea.

Tunnel vision is a thing after all.

But in general: there are very few, if any, instances where you can be morally right while being factually incorrect.

None of those instances include advocating for socialism.

Quick question is it kneck or neck

Neck

Ken

Kek

Thank you

I had to prove a teenager wrong

Whats kneck?

Lol. Glad we could help with that difficult task! Teenagers know everything!

Man, like Blonde, Ann Coulter can sure be annoying at times.

Coulter is intentionally annoying. It's part of her schtick

Ya, i know. But it works better when she is right, its harder to stand when she is wrong (or just misguided).
But thankfully, i don't follow her much.

I find Blonde way more palatable than Anne Coulter.

Anne is just too out there.....No weed? What her problem? She has never smoked

wow oil sanctions on Venezuela.....The first true sanctions which actually will hurt the people.

As far as I know, her opposition to drug legalization is economic in nature.

Which is to say, don't legalize drugs while people are able to live on welfare while they shoot up all day.

she doesn't want people to be pot head....I know pot heads now...

Weed legalization may fix some crime issues, but will ultimately increase some health problems in society.

you legalize it there be selling weed business owner pot heads

Ok. But that doesn’t change the fact that certain health problems will increase.

certainly.....but people should be free to make dumb decisions....you want to smoke...ok...but pay more for your health care

We’re still in a smoking epidemic with tobacco. About 15% of the US adult population still smokes.

Yeah. I generally agree with that sentiment. We just need to determine an effective method for figuring out if people are driving high.

I don’t know if one exists now.

I think the best idea for reducing drug problems is shifting the responsibility to the states.

Each state will do something different and we can see what produces the best results

I think there is a test for driving while high

I keep seeing stats like 36% tested positive for weed....so there must be a test?

One of the reasons I'm against sin taxes is because they do stupid things like try to fund education on weed sales. All of a sudden the incentives for the government are messed up.
If you're going to have sin taxes, it should only pay for things related to that sin. For example, cigarette taxes should only pay for things like health problems related to smoking, or programs to help people quit smoking. Same thing should apply to things like alcohol taxes and weed taxes.