Message from @Lord Zedd
Discord ID: 555885031122272267
both these points cannot be true at once
I don't think automation is the doomsday scenario it's being made out to be, but I do agree that it's funny how some people who think it is also want to artificially inflate the population
It's clear that these are political positions and not moral ones
Or even logical ones
grrr dissenter seems to be down
Well assuming climate change kills almost everyone in 12 years, automation shouldnt be an unemployment issue
Wew lad
that's something I don't get in their mythos I guess, how they're getting the temperature is going up 1 or 2C maybe to OMG WE'RE ALL GONNA FUCKING DIE IN 12 YEARS!
I feel I'm missing a few dozen steps
at most by their estimates there's a some potential infrastructure that'll need to be made maybe a few beach side homes will have to be moved or lifted or small dykes might need to be built.
I think it's that attitude that believes that we are currently living in the optimal conditions, and not only that, but anything different from those optimal conditions would mean disaster. Never mind that the world has previously been warmer, and humanity has done okay.
Basically there's a point where we get fucked hard due to a chain reaction is the idea
basically if you play with the aircon everyone in the house dies
done better even
There's also the idea that the warming is happening faster than it has in the past which is not going to allow the plant life to shift zones fast enough, which could create a mass die off.
I think we have real environmental problems like soil erosion, plastic pollution, overfishing and deforestation/desertification that we could be focusing on far more productively.
that I'm in favour of
those things are actionable
Yes
The AGW fear is an implacable an existential threat that lends itself to keeping the population in paralyzed anxiety rather than galvanized to action.
we can reclaim forest for the Congo and Amazon, we can prevent the spread of the Sahara, we can clean water
but those things actually need work and not just money and government projects
We don't need to go to Congo, we can reforest and repair watersheds in the American west first.
Would make our water supplies and ecologies far more resilient
the US isn't really that bad off in the grand scheme of things
Not yet @Lord Zedd
the Congo and the Amazon are major contributors to the climate over all
My state has huge tracts of land badly degraded by overgrazing of cattle that could use serious restoration.
I believe in acting locally.
I should say that some efforts have been done on the Sahara and the Congo
India as well has been some conservation as well
their efforts are definitely something to watch
Greening the Sahara would be great, don't get me wrong--I just want Africans to take the lead on it.
which they kind of are
the efforts in planting trees to turn back the Sahara are showing positive trends which is good and could mean it'll work in other areas
like here in Aus
there used to be a forest that ran right down the middle of Australia that helped water travel very far inland that got destroyed by the Aboriginals, I'd personally love to see that rebuilt
efforts for reforestation and conversation have been tried in the Amazon as well, Steve Irwin had an interesting way of doing it by basically buying up large chunks of land to protect it
That's excellent. I know there have been some good results from experimental cattle driving practices in Africa too where they mimic the behavior of predators to force the cattle to clump up and move around more frequently--it gives the landscape more time to recover between being trampled and grazed and it helps restore arid grasslands.
which works great until a government comes along and says fuck you we're taking that land anyway and selling it
I would do something like that here if I were a billionaire or king of America