Communism hasnt came into fruition for one reason, and one reason alone: Proletarian revolution cannot exist

The only difference between Accelerationism and Communist revolution, is that Accelerationism seeks to collapse the system, and Communism seeks to overthrow the system. In the end the goal is the same: to radically change the system.

But this end goal has never been achieved. Accelerationism has never caused a single system to collapse, and Communist revolution has never happened.

Anarchism seeks to remove the system alltogether. I still need to look into Anarchism

Apparently an anarchist revolution took place during the Spanish Civil War, but i dont know much about it

Apparently the "Anarchism" was short lived, because there's a government of Spain

>and a socialist pm 😂 so much for the "revolution"

Antifa have very little to do with fascism it's just a word for anyone they don't like for them like all language it's just a tool for them, they simply want to tear down "late stage" capitalism they think society is doomed and should just burned and started over

this is very much same though that goes into Accelarationism but taken from a different angle, that there's no hope for the cultural value of western society and it should be burned and started over

Antifa think our economic system is bad, Accelerationists think our cultural system is bad

No, because Accelerationists want to collapse the government and ecpnomic system, not our culture

The collapse of a culture is a consequence of "inclusiveness" and "multiculturalism"

you have that backwards, the culture is the issue for them it's leading to a collapse which they seek to accelerate then restart without that culture

Okay then "Yang Gang" isnt accelerationist, then?

hmm

maybe you're right, but it still doesnt work

Yang gang is more just a meme than anything

The idea that we can redpill the "normies" on white genocide by social divide is silly

Polarization only breeds radicalism, not radical social change. Its how dictators get into power

@Sanpe The spanish civil war is a marxist vs facshist battle that happened in the interem years between WWI and WWII. Beligerants were on both sides offering the Spanish gibs in favor of joining their cause. The germans fought the russians in a proxy war for a few years to test out their new hardware on eachother.

the result was a fascist victory but a phyric sort. So much so that spain remained neutral in WWII as a result, having no resources to fight on either side.

that regime was later supported by the west as a counter to communist/socialist action in the nation through the cold war.

so basically the "revolution" failed

I mean, all revolutions fail if socialists mean that utopia happens.

the revolution succeeded at the goal of installing a dictatorship who provided social welfare benefits for everyone, installs a command economy, and starves the people.

the color of socialism was wrong though.

To be fair, Franco was more of a traditionalist than fascist. For example, he liked and supposed the Roman Catholics

And Orwell saw that the socialist side was more about grabbing power than socialistic things

no, socialists are NEVER about grabbing power for themselves 👼

Now give me all the power so I can grant you unicorns and rainbows and good stuff

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pelosi-says-she-backs-lowering-voting-age-to-16/ar-BBUMFMR

Children always have the best ideas

which is absolutely why we let them have sex with adults and sign legally binding documents and let them own guns.

After hearing aoc for months, i support moving the voter age to atleast 35

Hear hear.

If you can't be a president you can't vote for him.

If you can't have a conversation with using the word "like"

What if you're using simile?

I’d be in favor of raising the voting age to 25 tbqmfh

I think the only people who should vote are dead people, they have the most experience.

The dead are in the pockets of the necromancers though